
Team Normal Sucks
They want Trump to go away, but fight against everyone trying to hold him accountable.
Every week I highlight three newsletters that are worth your time.
If you find value in this project, do two things for me: (1) hit the Like button, and (2) share this with someone.
Most of what we do in Bulwark+ is only for our members, but this email will always be open to everyone. To get it each week, sign up for free here. (Just choose the free option at the bottom.)
1. Team Normal Sux
Josh Barro seems like heād fit in well around here:
Republicans are correct that many Democrats have acted hypocritically, raising alarm about Trump being a unique threat to democracy while they act to strengthen his grip on the Republican Party. But thereās lots of hypocrisy in politics. The reason this burns so much for the āTeam Normalā Republicans is that Democrats are making life more difficult for them on two dimensions ā theyāre making it harder (at the margin, anyway) for them and their allies to win Republican primaries, and theyāre helping to saddle the party with Trumpās preferred candidates, who are less likely to win general elections.
How do I know thatās the real reason Republicans are so indignant? Itās because when Democrats take actions that are consistent with their purported view that Trump is a danger to democracy ā such as, for example, pursuing a criminal investigation of his activities ā the āTeam Normalā Republicans complain about that, too. Right now, the Republican bellyaching is the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago ā itās unprecedented! it strengthens his hand! itās āoverreach,ā whatever ā even though the actions of the Democrat at issue here (Merrick Garland) are perfectly congruent with viewing Trump as a legitimate and direct threat to democracy. . . .
In the view of the Republicans who cry foul at these actions, itās the Democratsā responsibility not to back Trump or oppose him ā itās to ignore him, as they try mightily to do the same, in hopes that it will cause him to disappear in favor of another stronger potential nominee. That is, Democrats are supposed to participate in their strategy to get DeSantis nominated in 2024 ā itās their duty, even if it entails giving Trump a pass on criminal acts, and even though it will make Democrats less likely to win the 2024 election.
Read the whole thing and subscribe. Itās great.
Hereās the problem with Team Normal:
They hate Trumpism. They just want tax cuts and FedSoc justices. They look at the mouth-breathers who show up to Trump rallies and went to the insurrection and they would not be caught dead with any of those Very Fine People.
Team Normal wants nothing more than for Trump to go away. Doesnāt matter how. Jail. Defeat. The January 6 Committee. Whatever. Theyāre not picky.
But also, Team Normal cannotāunder any circumstancesāappear to want Trump to go away. And so they wind up pushing back against and defending Trump from the processes that could drive him out of American politics.
This isnāt a new phenomenon in human affairs.
Iām reading Liu Xixinās sci-fi classic The Three-Body Problem, which opens in Communist China during the Cultural Revolution. Thereās a scene at a struggle session in which a bunch of young communists are beating down a beloved former professor of theirs. Most of them donāt really want to hurt the guy. But one of the cadres is a real commie hard-ass. She starts whipping him with her belt.
And so the others join in because theyāre terrified that someone will be taking notes and will observe that they were less enthusiastic than their peer. Such an observation might go into a file. They might become the featured attraction at a future struggle session.
And thatās pretty much how Team Normal operates in Republican politics.
They started this revolution and now they want out. But they donāt have the sand to do anything about it. So they keep going along with whatever is required of them and hope that the Big Orange Problem just . . . takes care of itself.
In case youāre not a Bulwark+ member, Sarah Longwell and I do a weekly podcast only for members and itās pretty great. We almost never make it available to the outsiders, but this week I decided to give you a peek at the show where we talked about Trump 2024, the real heirs to Trumpism, and the saga of my trying to get a basketball hoop installed in my driveway. Give it a listen. Youāll like it. I promise.
2. TikTok Will Suck Too
Embedded has some great news for the Youngs: TikTokās comments are turning into Twitter!
One of the most quintessential negative Twitter experiences involves tweeting out a feeling or statement applicable only to you, and inevitably fielding at least one user whoās irate that the tweet didnāt speak to what someone totally different might feel or believe. As in, recommending a pizza place you just tried only to have a gluten-free vegan who is allergic to tomatoes in your replies, scolding you for not accounting for the sum of human experiences.


These gotchas and actuallies and bad faith readings aren't always personal. They can be reflexive, from a Debbie Downer to someone who pokes holes in things because theyāre rewarded for it with engagement. Others willfully misread and misrepresent a benign statement under the guise of social justice (for this, Twitter has Tumblr culture to thank).
But now, this behavior has migrated to comments on TikToks, previously one of the funnier and purer parts of the app, and itās particularly jarring to witness.
Read the whole thing and subscribe.
But itās not just the comments in TikTok! At Stratechery, Ben Thompson has a long and thoughtful piece about the future of social media and how TikTok is killing the social graph and replacing it with pure machine-learning goodness.
Thompson notes a brief history of social media by Sam Lessin that goes basically like this:
(1) The Pre-Internet āPeople Magazineā Era
(2) Content from āyour friendsā kills People Magazine
(3) Kardashians/Professional āfriendsā kill real friends
(4) Algorithmic everyone kills Kardashians
(5) Next is pure-AI content which beats āalgorithmic everyoneā
Itās going to be tight when everyone is watching custom-made, AI generated, three-minute videos on whatever is the dominant platform in ten years.
Maybe Quibi was just too early?
3. Better Teams
In his excellent newsletter, David Epstein interviews Dan Coyle about making remote team culture better. This is my jam:
David Epstein: In chapter 11 of Range, I write about āhealthy tensionā as part of a learning organization. I think this resonates with your suggestion to ācall out smoothness as a negative,ā even though that sounds counterintuitive. Can you explain what you mean?
Dan Coyle: When I started studying culture, I assumed that smoothness was a good thing. I thought that great cultures are tension-free places where people rarely disagree, where everybodyās aligned all of the time.
The truth is exactly the opposite. Great cultures actually contain more tension. Because people arenāt afraid to disagree, to argue energetically about big issues ā then go out for a beer. Because the relationships are strong enough to explore hard problems together. In weak cultures, you get what I call Smoothness Disease ā that tendency to want to pretend that everything is good. To walk past disagreements. To pretend that everything is good when it really isnāt.
The feeling of being in a great culture isnāt smoothness ā itās the feeling of solving hard problems with people you admire. Thatās a special feeling, and itās the reason that people inside great cultures love it so much. . . .
Ask your group: āLetās imagine itās one year from now and our organization is in a really bad spot. Nothing worked out. What caused that to happen?ā Naming those factors will help illuminate the hidden barriers and opportunities of the landscape youāre in, and help you to navigate.
Also: donāt be afraid to question your groupās values and assumptions. Iāve met a lot of good leaders who do that by cultivating what I call āproductive disgruntlement.ā They remain curious and questioning; they donāt drink the Kool-Aid. They are always asking: Do we really believe this? Does this still work? Where do we need to evolve? This is particularly important to do when youāre successful. Because success is the strongest narcotic ever created . . .
Coyle then talks about how to solicit effective feedback from team members and shares something Iām 100 percent going to use:
One quick feedback generator is the Three-Line Email, an idea from Laszlo Bock, CEO and founder of Humu. In it, you send an email to your group with these questions:
⢠What is one thing I currently do that youād like me to continue to do?
⢠What is one thing that I donāt currently do frequently enough that you think I should do more often?
⢠What can I do to make you more effective?
Thatās it.
I love that so much.
Finally, Coyle talks about how good leadership can sometimes be invisible:
David Epstein: You write that leaders in effective cultures sometimes ādisappear.ā That reminded me of this clip in which Coach K recounts joining the Dream Team as an assistant coach, and Chuck Daly tells him to put away his notebook, because he needs to learn to ignore things. Can you give an example of a leader helpfully disappearing?
Dan Coyle: Gregg Popovich is famous for vanishing during a timeout. Itās awesome: the players circle up like normal, waiting for him to appear and tell them what to do. And he ⦠doesnāt show up. The players look around ā and slowly realize, Hey, we gotta figure this out ourselves. And then they do.
Read the whole thing and absolutely subscribe. Iām convinced that one of the secrets of life is that you should never stop being curious. David Epsteinās newsletter is the product of a curious mind and itās always valuable.
If you find this newsletter valuable, please hit the like button and share it with a friend. And if you want to get the Newsletter of Newsletters every week, sign up below. Itās free.
But if youād like to get everything from Bulwark+ and be part of the conversation, too, you can do the paid version.
"That is, Democrats are supposed to participate in their strategy to get DeSantis nominated in 2024 ā itās their duty, even if it entails giving Trump a pass on criminal acts, and even though it will make Democrats less likely to win the 2024 election."
Precisely stated, and further, underlines a peskily persistent reality: the entire Republican Party has regressed at a truly astonishing rate from (mostly) functioning adults into a tree-fort full of eight-year-olds who want Mom to bring their dinner outside; they won't climb down that rickety ladder, come inside to wash their hands, and eat what's on their plate using appropriate utensils.
I voted Republican for a few cycles, but after being Gingrich-ed, realized if I ever wanted anything of any substance to be accomplished in this country, I was, for the foreseeable future, gonna be a Democratic voter.
They don't always act like grownups, but they, at least, can be counted on to show up, give democracy a go, and eat dinner with their mouths closed.
Team Normalās 30 year quest of wealth inequality has got them into this pickle. The prepping pro-corporate justices to be āpro-lifeā has done this. Dobbs was because the bill had become due. Had they wanted to, they could have over-turned Roe v Wade before. People forget it was a Republican appointed majority Supreme Court that fiated RvW into law in the first place.
Most paycheck-earning people donāt want what the Republicans were selling and they still donāt. Even evangelicals like me shouldnāt want it because the Bible rarely celebrates the wealthy and is loudly against āunequal scalesā which is now represented by how our tax structure and other legislation is created. Even the Tax Foundation admitted that policies have contributed to our extreme wealth inequality (or they said so in one throw-away sentence while disputing the value of the Inflation Reduction Act). But you know, you have to crack a few eggs...
I wish more normal republicans would realize that their āfiscal conservatismā has got them this. I donāt see that even now, however. Few people buy what theyāre selling so yes, theyāre going to be stuck with the culture-war crazies if they continue to sell such unpalatable wares.