7 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Amanda's avatar

Coverage on this issue is shockingly bad in general --- especially on the numbers, which always fluctuate, including seasonally, and for reasons that are not always as clear or simple as they may seem. Aside from the round-up-the-usual-suspects human-interest stories, there's not much to help people think through this issue intelligently.

I wouldn't put this down to an anti-Biden media bias{*} --- these are different beats, and Biden's debate disaster was not just newsworthy but historic --- but to despair-inducingly inadequate reporting.

----------------------------------

{*} don't mean to put words in your mouth; adjust as needed

Expand full comment
SandyG's avatar

Agree, Amanda.

Expand full comment
Lady Emsworth's avatar

Clicks. It's always about the clicks.

"Border Crossings Down!" - meh. . .

"Hordes of Immigrants!" - Wow! - what. . ?

Expand full comment
SandyG's avatar

It was ever thus. Before the internet, the watchword for local news broadcasts was "If it bleeds, it leads".

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Dog bites man, not even on the back page.

Man bites dog, lead above the fold, page 1.

Expand full comment
Mike Lew's avatar

It is bias. Cries of "open borders" were flung around all year. Yet, substantial real reductions in borders interactions happened and it was crickets. Noone will ever convince me that omissions were anything but deliberate.

Expand full comment
Rita Ritter's avatar

And drama. LetтАЩs not forget the DRAMA! Immigrant army crossing border. US under attack. Is always more dramatic than fentanyl supply drying up or immigration is down. By the way, as we all know, most of the fentanyl comes in by truck or even by US citizens loooking to make a quick buck.

Expand full comment