The Bulwark

The Bulwark

Home
Watch
Shows
Newsletters
Chat
Special Projects
Events
Founders
FAQ
Store
Archive
About
The Triad

The Danger to Democracy Behind the Birthright Debate

The risk in making citizenship dependent on politicians instead of the Constitution.

Benjamin Parker's avatar
Benjamin Parker
Jul 01, 2026
∙ Paid

Hey guys—I’m sitting in for JVL today. Happy Fourth of July week, and happy Canada Day to our readers up north. A little programming note: I just recorded a video with two top immigration experts and our own Adrian Carrasquillo answering questions from the Bulwark community about SCOTUS’s immigration decisions. That should be out this evening—stay tuned.

–Ben

(Photo illustration by Sarah Rogers/The Bulwark | Photos: Shutterstock)

1. A Citizenship Scenario

We should all be very glad that the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship. If the justices had overturned it, the first-order implications would have been appalling for hundreds of thousands of immigrants and their children, and for people who were adopted—even if they were born in America to American parents and raised in America by American parents.

But the second-order effects could have been catastrophic for democracy—and the threat against birthright citizenship isn’t entirely gone, so it’s worth taking a good, hard look at it.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Center Enterprises, Inc · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture