The Bulwark

The Bulwark

Home
Shows
Newsletters
Chat
Special Projects
Events
Founders
Store
Archive
About

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Dreamers' Fate Is Still Uncertain
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from The Bulwark
The Bulwark is home to Sarah Longwell, Tim Miller, Bill Kristol, JVL, Sam Stein, and more. We are the largest pro-democracy bundle on Substack for news and analysis on politics and culture—supported by a community built on good-faith.
Over 821,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

The Dreamers' Fate Is Still Uncertain

Thanks to a recent court decision—and decades of Congressional inaction—hundreds of thousands could be deported.

Linda Chavez's avatar
Linda Chavez
Sep 19, 2023
47

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Dreamers' Fate Is Still Uncertain
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4
Share
Immigration advocates rally to urge Congress to pass permanent protections for DACA recipients and create a pathway to citizenship, near the U.S. Capitol June 15, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

THEY ARE AMONG THE MOST DESERVING and sympathetic of undocumented immigrants—Dreamers, whose parents brought them over the border when they were mere children—but they may soon lose the temporary legal status they’ve enjoyed for more than a decade. An Obama-era policy called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) allowed Dreamers to remain in the United States and work so long as they had no criminal record, had paid any taxes owed, and graduated from high school or served in the military. Last week, Judge Andrew Hanen of the Southern District of Texas ruled the program illegal.

The case against DACA has been up and down the federal judiciary since the program was initiated in 2012 (a useful timeline can be found here), but ended up back in Hanen’s court on remand from the Fifth Circuit after the Biden administration issued formal rules to implement what had been a policy initiated by executive memorandum. When the Supreme Court considered the fate of DACA in 2020, the Justices found 5-4 that the Trump administration’s efforts to shut down the program altogether violated the Administrative Procedures Act, which gave supporters hope that if the policy went through formal rule-making under the APA, it might pass legal muster. Hanen’s decision in the latest challenge rejected that argument, but it will be appealed to the Fifth Circuit and ultimately the Supreme Court. Sadly, given the current composition of both courts, it’s unlikely to be overturned. So where does that leave Dreamers?

Hanen specifically allowed continued protection for current DACA participants, who number about 600,000, but barred the Department of Homeland Security from allowing new applications for the program. Some 400,000 young people who meet DACA’s eligibility standards but cannot apply are therefore subject to deportation. And it isn’t just the DACA recipients who are affected. According to the advocacy group FWD.US, more than one million U.S. citizens live in households with DACA members. And among DACA recipients, nearly half have some college education, nearly 80 percent are in the workforce, a third have children. Their average age is 29 and they’ve lived in the U.S. an average of 24 years. These numbers help explain why Americans overwhelmingly support permanent legal status for Dreamers.

If you think being American is at least as much about what’s in your head and your heart as what’s in your passport, you belong with us. Join Bulwark+ today.

Pew Research Center data show 74 percent of all adults favor legal status, with a majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents joining the 91 percent of Democrats. And in battleground states in 2022, by 74 percent to 18 percent, voters said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who supported a path to citizenship for Dreamers. But those polling numbers have done little to push Congress to act. As the courts have repeatedly made clear, barring Congressional action, Dreamers’ status remains precarious. Yet, bipartisan bills go nowhere, and, sadly, the Biden administration hasn’t made the issue a legislative priority.

Congressional dysfunction on a number of issues—from funding the government to approving military promotions—is a national disgrace. But on no issue has paralysis, dishonesty, and fear been more pervasive than on immigration. The last time Congress passed comprehensive immigration reform was 1986, and even that legislation, the Immigration Reform and Control Act, did nothing to set the stage for the country’s future need for immigrants. Since then, consecutive presidents and Congresses controlled by both political parties have failed to modernize our immigration system so that individuals who want to work and contribute to our society can come legally rather than crossing the border without permission. Illegal immigration has ebbed and flowed in the nearly 40 years since—with its lowest point reached just before Donald Trump took office. With the exception of a temporary lull during the pandemic, the trends in illegal immigration have soared since then.

Share

There’s little question that the status quo is unsustainable. Border officials encountered migrants trying to enter the United States without permission more than 2.4 million times in 2022. These were not 2 million individuals—some migrants make multiple attempts to enter, so the number of individuals involved may be a fraction of the number of attempted crossings—and most did not end up staying here even on a temporary basis, but the numbers are staggering nonetheless and help feed a narrative that our border is out of control.

But current levels of illegal immigration have nothing to do with the Dreamers who’ve lived nearly their whole lives here, are studying, working, paying taxes, and serving in our military. Unless Congress acts and soon, these young people, Americans in every sense but legal status, face a dangerous future. They may well lose their right to work or study. They may be deported—some already have been through no fault of their own. Employers face the prospect of losing trained and essential workers. American-citizen children may lose their parents, spouses their husband or wife. Communities will lose tax dollars, school children their teachers, hospitals their nurses and doctors, landlords their tenants, businesses their customers. All because members of Congress would rather use immigration as political fodder for their base—on both the right and left—than put legislation to a vote.

In 1984, in a televised debate with his Democratic opponent Walter Mondale, Ronald Reagan said, “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally.” He made those words reality for 2.7 million people in 1986. Would that those who today claim his mantle in the GOP would do so again with respect to Dreamers. Even if Congress won’t take on the bigger issue of immigration reform, this problem could be solved with little controversy or outcry. It’s the right thing to do.

Share

bwelchmiami's avatar
Dan Kowalski's avatar
Kelly Grey's avatar
Jim Swift's avatar
Wisley Lau's avatar
47 Likes∙
4 Restacks
47

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Dreamers' Fate Is Still Uncertain
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4
Share
A guest post by
Linda Chavez
Former director of the White House Office of Public Liaison and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights during the Reagan administration, Chavez writes frequently on public policy.
Subscribe to Linda
The American Age Is Over
Emergency Triad: The United States commits imperial suicide.
Apr 3 • 
Jonathan V. Last
5,344

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The American Age Is Over
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1,469
How to Think (and Act) Like a Dissident Movement
AOC, solidarity, and people power.
Mar 24 • 
Jonathan V. Last
4,110

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
How to Think (and Act) Like a Dissident Movement
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1,170
“How Can You Look at Yourself in the Mirror?”
George is furious.
Apr 3 • 
Sarah Longwell
2,110

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
“How Can You Look at Yourself in the Mirror?”
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
349
49:37

Ready for more?

© 2025 Bulwark Media
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More