The Bulwark

The Bulwark

Home
Shows
Newsletters
Special Projects
Events
Founders
Store
Archive
About

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Foxconn Boondoggle Was Even Worse Than We Thought
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from The Bulwark
The Bulwark is home to Sarah Longwell, Tim Miller, Bill Kristol, JVL, Sam Stein, and more. We are the largest pro-democracy bundle on Substack for news and analysis on politics and culture—supported by a community built on good-faith.
Over 819,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

The Foxconn Boondoggle Was Even Worse Than We Thought

Corporate welfare is almost always a bad idea.

Charlie Sykes's avatar
Charlie Sykes
Feb 07, 2019

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Foxconn Boondoggle Was Even Worse Than We Thought
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
The groundbreaking ceremony for the new Foxconn plant. (Photo by Andy Manis/Getty Images)

Let’s start with a confession. Earlier this week when Andrew Egger compared the unraveling Foxconn deal to the operatically shambolic Fyre festival, I worried that the comparison was unfair. My bad.

Now comes an extraordinary deep dive investigation by Bloomberg BusinessWeek that paints a stunning picture of a politically driven deal that is melting down. While Foxconn’s story lacks the drama and supermodels of the Fyre festival, it more than makes up it for by the scale of its boondoggle. Touted as the ā€œEighth Wonder of the World,’; and the ā€œone of the great deals everā€ by President Trump, Foxconn has become a $4.5 billion cautionary tale of the dangers of corporate welfare and Trumpian industrial policy.

Despite repeated promises and an avalanche of taxpayer cash and hype, no one now expects the company to create anywhere near the 13,000 jobs that were promised. In fact, those promises appear to have been hollow from the beginning.

As a Wisconsinite, I’ve followed the progress of Foxconn from the beginning, and thought the taxpayer subsidies were ill-advised, even as I hoped that the deal would somehow lead to the revitalization of the state’s economy and the creation of thousands of high-wage manufacturing jobs in my backyard. But it all turns out to be worse than even the critics might have thought.

 Austin Carr reports that ā€œinsiders describe a chaotic environment with ever-changing goals far different from what Trump and others promised.ā€ He writes:

The only consistency, many of these people say, lay in how obvious it was that Wisconsin struck a weak deal. Under the terms [Governor Scott] Walker negotiated, each job at the Mount Pleasant factory is projected to cost the state at least $219,000 in tax breaks and other incentives. The good or extra-bad news, depending on your perspective, is that there probably won’t be 13,000 of them.

Like other cases of corporate welfare (think Amazon’s HQ2 madness), the deal was driven by a bidding war with other states who vied with one another in offering taxpayer subsidies to the massively profitable Taiwanese company. So, ultimately, the deal was shaped more by politics than market forces, and therein lay the problem.

Despite railing against government ā€œpicking winners and losers,ā€ Trump and Wisconsin Republicans embraced a version of state capitalism or corporatism where the lines between politics and the free market were erased. Dumb and reckless decisions followed.

As Carr’s story makes clear, the Foxconn deal was, from the start, always ā€œnakedly political.ā€ Fittingly enough, it all began with a call to Wisconsin’s lead jobs agency from the office of boy genius Jared Kushner, who pushed the idea.

Goaded by Trump, Wisconsin’s GOP found the deal irresistible, even to the point of ignoring Foxconn’s problematic track record:

Foxconn has a history of overpromising and underdelivering on major deals. In Brazil in 2011 and India in 2015, it pledged to invest billions of dollars and create tens of thousands of jobs after [Foxconn Chairman Terry] Gou courted each country’s leaders, but each project fell far short. In 2013, Foxconn said it would invest $30 million and employ as many as 500 people at a Pennsylvania factory that also never fully materialized. Multiple former executives say Gou makes big promises to secure favorable terms and is unsentimental about reneging on or abandoning them as costs dictate.

In contrast with Gou, I’m sorry to say, my fellow Wisconsinites come off looking like rubes.

ā€œMy impression of him was, what a nice person,ā€ says Scott Neitzel, who led negotiations for the Walker administration. ā€œAn extremely genuine, down-to-earth tycoon.ā€ When asked if the state looked at Foxconn’s history, WEDC Chief Executive Officer Mark Hogan says, ā€œWe didn’t spend a lot of time on that because, in the end, we got to know these people so well.ā€

Apparently not. In late January, Gou’s right-hand man, Louis Woo, told Reuters that Foxconn was planning to downsize the planned LCD plant, shifting their plans from manufacturing to research.

ā€œIn terms of TV, we have no place in the U.S.,ā€ he said. ā€œWe can’t compete.ā€

Foxconn walked that back after a phone call between Gou and Trump, saying that ā€œafter productive discussions,ā€ Foxconn was ā€œmoving forward with our planned construction of a Gen 6 fab facility, which will be at the heart of the Wisconn Valley Science and Technology Park. This campus will serve both as an advanced manufacturing facility as well as a hub of high technology innovation for the region.ā€

As Egger noted here on The Bulwark, this sounded good, ā€œexcept that it doesn’t address Foxconn’s central problem: the competitive disadvantage of hiring manufacturing jobs in the U.S.ā€

Once again, the statement seemed driven more by a desire to kiss the president’s ring than by business realities. So what will Foxconn do? Short term, they are likely to maintain a sort of Trumpian Potemkin village in Wisconsin to keep up the appearance that the company is doing Trump’s bidding. But almost everyone Carr spoke to for his article ā€œpredicted there will never be anywhere near 13,000 workers in Wisconsin Valley.ā€

Politics, as it turns out, is a poor substitute for the free market. Republicans used to know that. Now they are paying the price for forgetting it.


Subscribe to The Bulwark

Tens of thousands of paid subscribers
The Bulwark is home to Sarah Longwell, Tim Miller, Bill Kristol, JVL, Sam Stein, and more. We are the largest pro-democracy bundle on Substack for news and analysis on politics and culture—supported by a community built on good-faith.

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Foxconn Boondoggle Was Even Worse Than We Thought
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
The American Age Is Over
Emergency Triad: The United States commits imperial suicide.
Apr 3 ā€¢ 
Jonathan V. Last
5,345

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The American Age Is Over
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1,469
How to Think (and Act) Like a Dissident Movement
AOC, solidarity, and people power.
Mar 24 ā€¢ 
Jonathan V. Last
4,114

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
How to Think (and Act) Like a Dissident Movement
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1,170
ā€œHow Can You Look at Yourself in the Mirror?ā€
George is furious.
Apr 3 ā€¢ 
Sarah Longwell
2,112

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
ā€œHow Can You Look at Yourself in the Mirror?ā€
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
349
49:37

Ready for more?

Ā© 2025 Bulwark Media
Privacy āˆ™ Terms āˆ™ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More