The solution, if there is one, is to hire a ton of new USCIS asylum officers. The "problem" that creates though is if you're doing that, you've also got to hire new USCIS officers at the processing centers, which speeds up legal immigration processing. Which, y'know, the nativists in the Republican Party are agai…
The solution, if there is one, is to hire a ton of new USCIS asylum officers. The "problem" that creates though is if you're doing that, you've also got to hire new USCIS officers at the processing centers, which speeds up legal immigration processing. Which, y'know, the nativists in the Republican Party are against, too.
I'll go through the mechanisms of how this works practically, but more USCIS asylum denials creates more workload and headache for the Immigration Courts.
I honestly have no idea.
The solution, if there is one, is to hire a ton of new USCIS asylum officers. The "problem" that creates though is if you're doing that, you've also got to hire new USCIS officers at the processing centers, which speeds up legal immigration processing. Which, y'know, the nativists in the Republican Party are against, too.
I'll go through the mechanisms of how this works practically, but more USCIS asylum denials creates more workload and headache for the Immigration Courts.