I was going to write a similar comment! It was either George or Ben Wittes who said that these kinds of cases are the "bread and butter" of Alvin Bragg's office. So for people to say that anyone other than T***p wouldn't have been prosecuted, and that he was in effect picked on, is ridiculous.
I was going to write a similar comment! It was either George or Ben Wittes who said that these kinds of cases are the "bread and butter" of Alvin Bragg's office. So for people to say that anyone other than T***p wouldn't have been prosecuted, and that he was in effect picked on, is ridiculous.
Tim pointed out the very thing you said: we'll never know what would've happened in 2016 if this hadn't been covered up. It's disappointing that Bulwark folks downplay the seriousness of the case; the main point wasn't paying off Stormy, it was interfering in the election.
I was going to write a similar comment! It was either George or Ben Wittes who said that these kinds of cases are the "bread and butter" of Alvin Bragg's office. So for people to say that anyone other than T***p wouldn't have been prosecuted, and that he was in effect picked on, is ridiculous.
Tim pointed out the very thing you said: we'll never know what would've happened in 2016 if this hadn't been covered up. It's disappointing that Bulwark folks downplay the seriousness of the case; the main point wasn't paying off Stormy, it was interfering in the election.