It's not that I thought that was your goal (in fact, reading many more of your comments has convinced me that it's not), but I aspire to give the benefit of the doubt.
The way I see it, if one *truly* cares about an idea, one would seek to change hearts and minds in support of one's idea. To not do so, to me, suggests such a person either: (1) doesn't really care what people think, and just wants their desired outcome, which ultimately is inflicted through force (sounds kinda "repugniKKKlan", doesn't it?), or (2) doesn't *truly* care about the idea about which so much noise is being made; the noise is the point.
I won't declare which of these you are coming across as, nor will I not address how I disagree with your manner of conveyance; after all, "Ppl need 2 come 2 the right judgment on their own. I dont want 2 placate them."
Addressing people in this manner is not the most effective way to win hearts and minds.
It's not that I thought that was your goal (in fact, reading many more of your comments has convinced me that it's not), but I aspire to give the benefit of the doubt.
The way I see it, if one *truly* cares about an idea, one would seek to change hearts and minds in support of one's idea. To not do so, to me, suggests such a person either: (1) doesn't really care what people think, and just wants their desired outcome, which ultimately is inflicted through force (sounds kinda "repugniKKKlan", doesn't it?), or (2) doesn't *truly* care about the idea about which so much noise is being made; the noise is the point.
I won't declare which of these you are coming across as, nor will I not address how I disagree with your manner of conveyance; after all, "Ppl need 2 come 2 the right judgment on their own. I dont want 2 placate them."