I'm dealing w/ Covid for the first time, so have been mostly out of it the last couple of days. Maybe everyone else already knows this, but I was astounded to read this in Heather CR's letter from last night:
"On Wednesday night, far-right influencer Nick Fuentes responded to Trump: 'F*ck you. You suck. You are fat, you are a joke, you are stupid, you are not funny, you are not as smart as you think you are.' '[W]e are going to look back on the MAGA movement as the biggest scam in American history,' he added. 'And the liberals were right. The MAGA supporters were had. They were.'"
1) Alert to all criminals, try to be Pres. if you want to avoid jail?
2) Pres T has patterns? Study the two words here, "non-disclosure agreement". If it's happened multiple times, it's a pattern?
DETAILS. Some people use wealth to avoid accountability. Avoid a public condemnation? Avoid having a wife find out? Avoid a jail sentence? Better be born rich if planning to use non-disclosures more than once?
Yes, sometimes there is a false allegation (believable evidence being no other allegations). More often, it's true (pattern recognized via repetition). Not-so-rich victims get a big bunch of money. They promise what? not to talk about the sins committed, maybe even to say good things. They hope the "Perp" (perpetrator) has "learned a lesson", won't do it again?
BUT...What if those paid hear "the perp" (perpetrator) was a repeater? Do the prior victims paid not to tell, have to continue staying silent? We'd say no.
What if they instead want to disclose, so they can get another round of money? Then, we'd not be so sure.
What if the sex was consensual? Both payer and those paid can then look shady. Does that let the payer off, make him safe to be around?? Would you let your granddaughter stay overnight at his house back in 2018, trust him?
In 2018 two women tried to have their non-disclosures revoked
In 2018, TWO different women promising not to tell, a model (paid $150,000) and an actress (paid $130,000), went to court wanting to revoke their non-disclosures with the Pres. Both had sex (separately) with the man (multi-times married, his being divorced first possibly not a requirement before sleeping with the next wife, leaving several wives unhappy).
Varied sites have written about the case. An article in the New Yorker in March 2018 seemed to favor "letting it go" IF the payer is a President, as if expecting all Pres. to be payers. (Was that a year that payments for non-disclosure agreements were allowed as tax deductions?)
A few months later, August 2018, a professor at Stanford Law raised more issues. If the silence payments were donated by outsiders/third parties, they could be campaign contributions? Illegal under certain circumstances? See
For the two paid to be silent, the lesser known was model Karen McDougal. The better-known was actress Stephanie Clifford, with Michael Cohen the attorney for Trump arranging payments.
Sadly, I'm not a lawyer. (The next points are thus likely "over my head"):
Cohen arranged things so well, that only Cohen went to jail? The Pres has "plausible deniability"? Or, is it that he desperately hopes for a third term, as some court said he can only go to jail once he's no longer Pres? (Again, over my head.)
I have all my criminal clients announce they are running for President and argue it's too close to the election to proceed with the case and that it is political retaliation.
Side note to JD Vance’s demand that WSJ release the letter.
Lawrence O’Donnell suggests that this is actually JDV’s first or at least latest move to undermine Trump and ascend to the Presidency himself.
Lawrence’s point is that the last thing Trump wants is for that letter to be seen, discussed, debated, etc.
It is a little odd of JD to demand that.
And why does he say WSJ should have shown the letter “to us.” The “royal we,” already? Slow down JD. And it would only be fitting if FrankenEpstein drags you all into oblivion.
I doubt the WSJ would publish this if they had any doubts about it being authentic. So Trump's supporters ought to put on their big girl pants and ask him about it, and his relationship with Epstein, and what secret they shared.
I'm guessing someone brought this to them and had the receipts. Its news. Hence if they are a news paper they have to publish it. Even Murdoch has this ethic.
Play the Trump pussy tape over and over again with the description of his birthday letter.. he has many public statements that have been just as terrible
I really enjoyed your one person staged reading of t’s birthday expose. Some sterling moments. Soto voice shifts, self possessed facial expressions. Those chops how did you get so good at this? Did you get your start in HS drama club? It looks natural you should do more theater,
Does anyone think that "enigmas" is code for "vaginas?"
I'm dealing w/ Covid for the first time, so have been mostly out of it the last couple of days. Maybe everyone else already knows this, but I was astounded to read this in Heather CR's letter from last night:
"On Wednesday night, far-right influencer Nick Fuentes responded to Trump: 'F*ck you. You suck. You are fat, you are a joke, you are stupid, you are not funny, you are not as smart as you think you are.' '[W]e are going to look back on the MAGA movement as the biggest scam in American history,' he added. 'And the liberals were right. The MAGA supporters were had. They were.'"
They may be "enigma" because there are no names allowed assigned to the faces of the girls.
Scum acts like scum! News at 11! How can a person be so formulaic when he spends all his time trying to get attention?
1) Alert to all criminals, try to be Pres. if you want to avoid jail?
2) Pres T has patterns? Study the two words here, "non-disclosure agreement". If it's happened multiple times, it's a pattern?
DETAILS. Some people use wealth to avoid accountability. Avoid a public condemnation? Avoid having a wife find out? Avoid a jail sentence? Better be born rich if planning to use non-disclosures more than once?
Yes, sometimes there is a false allegation (believable evidence being no other allegations). More often, it's true (pattern recognized via repetition). Not-so-rich victims get a big bunch of money. They promise what? not to talk about the sins committed, maybe even to say good things. They hope the "Perp" (perpetrator) has "learned a lesson", won't do it again?
BUT...What if those paid hear "the perp" (perpetrator) was a repeater? Do the prior victims paid not to tell, have to continue staying silent? We'd say no.
What if they instead want to disclose, so they can get another round of money? Then, we'd not be so sure.
What if the sex was consensual? Both payer and those paid can then look shady. Does that let the payer off, make him safe to be around?? Would you let your granddaughter stay overnight at his house back in 2018, trust him?
In 2018 two women tried to have their non-disclosures revoked
In 2018, TWO different women promising not to tell, a model (paid $150,000) and an actress (paid $130,000), went to court wanting to revoke their non-disclosures with the Pres. Both had sex (separately) with the man (multi-times married, his being divorced first possibly not a requirement before sleeping with the next wife, leaving several wives unhappy).
Varied sites have written about the case. An article in the New Yorker in March 2018 seemed to favor "letting it go" IF the payer is a President, as if expecting all Pres. to be payers. (Was that a year that payments for non-disclosure agreements were allowed as tax deductions?)
A few months later, August 2018, a professor at Stanford Law raised more issues. If the silence payments were donated by outsiders/third parties, they could be campaign contributions? Illegal under certain circumstances? See
https://law.stanford.edu/2018/08/22/cohen-trump-and-campaign-finance-violations/
For the two paid to be silent, the lesser known was model Karen McDougal. The better-known was actress Stephanie Clifford, with Michael Cohen the attorney for Trump arranging payments.
Sadly, I'm not a lawyer. (The next points are thus likely "over my head"):
Cohen arranged things so well, that only Cohen went to jail? The Pres has "plausible deniability"? Or, is it that he desperately hopes for a third term, as some court said he can only go to jail once he's no longer Pres? (Again, over my head.)
I have all my criminal clients announce they are running for President and argue it's too close to the election to proceed with the case and that it is political retaliation.
Check Jay Kuo, Status Kuo, "Enigmas Never Age"
Side note to JD Vance’s demand that WSJ release the letter.
Lawrence O’Donnell suggests that this is actually JDV’s first or at least latest move to undermine Trump and ascend to the Presidency himself.
Lawrence’s point is that the last thing Trump wants is for that letter to be seen, discussed, debated, etc.
It is a little odd of JD to demand that.
And why does he say WSJ should have shown the letter “to us.” The “royal we,” already? Slow down JD. And it would only be fitting if FrankenEpstein drags you all into oblivion.
maybe T***p doesn't know what an enigma is ... or the enigma that never ages is the gamin who keeps get recruited from high school
Enigma anagram: gamine. Young girl.
EW. OMG. This may be right. God, these people are filth.
I doubt the WSJ would publish this if they had any doubts about it being authentic. So Trump's supporters ought to put on their big girl pants and ask him about it, and his relationship with Epstein, and what secret they shared.
You wanted a conspiracy. Now you have one.
fr a right-leaning pub that carries water for the Fuhrer doesn't publish something damaging unless they REALLY have reason to.
I'm guessing someone brought this to them and had the receipts. Its news. Hence if they are a news paper they have to publish it. Even Murdoch has this ethic.
Play the Trump pussy tape over and over again with the description of his birthday letter.. he has many public statements that have been just as terrible
Have you looked into the court records of the 13 year old
I really enjoyed your one person staged reading of t’s birthday expose. Some sterling moments. Soto voice shifts, self possessed facial expressions. Those chops how did you get so good at this? Did you get your start in HS drama club? It looks natural you should do more theater,
A fan
Why did the State Dept. just shut down the section that investigates sex trafficking?
I hope the WSJ didn't set us up.
It would make one wonder what else is in the file.