Charlie is quick to demand names of respectable Republicans who made racist comments while using nameless, faceless “Democrats” as a cudgel for his “crying wolf” charges. Bothsiderism is apparently his only defense against clearly delineated moral differences between the two parties.
I’d eat my words if he could make a reasoned argument …
Charlie is quick to demand names of respectable Republicans who made racist comments while using nameless, faceless “Democrats” as a cudgel for his “crying wolf” charges. Bothsiderism is apparently his only defense against clearly delineated moral differences between the two parties.
I’d eat my words if he could make a reasoned argument about non-racist “good” Republicans by listing all the legislation that was authored, supported and passed by the Rs to alleviate structural inequalities for racial minorities and the working poor. How far back would he have to go to make that case?
Charlie is quick to demand names of respectable Republicans who made racist comments while using nameless, faceless “Democrats” as a cudgel for his “crying wolf” charges. Bothsiderism is apparently his only defense against clearly delineated moral differences between the two parties.
I’d eat my words if he could make a reasoned argument about non-racist “good” Republicans by listing all the legislation that was authored, supported and passed by the Rs to alleviate structural inequalities for racial minorities and the working poor. How far back would he have to go to make that case?
Probably Eisenhower.