I guess this can happen when you go after groupers (or should I say groypers?) instead of whales.
If memory serves, Jack Smith could have charged Trump with inciting or aiding an insurrection - a factual conclusion which the Supreme Court just ducked (but left ostentatiously undisturbed) in the Colorado ballot case - but chose discretion …
I guess this can happen when you go after groupers (or should I say groypers?) instead of whales.
If memory serves, Jack Smith could have charged Trump with inciting or aiding an insurrection - a factual conclusion which the Supreme Court just ducked (but left ostentatiously undisturbed) in the Colorado ballot case - but chose discretion over valor instead .
I guess this can happen when you go after groupers (or should I say groypers?) instead of whales.
If memory serves, Jack Smith could have charged Trump with inciting or aiding an insurrection - a factual conclusion which the Supreme Court just ducked (but left ostentatiously undisturbed) in the Colorado ballot case - but chose discretion over valor instead .
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1999-title18-section2383&num=0&edition=1999#:~:text=Whoever%20incites%2C%20sets%20on%20foot,office%20under%20the%20United%20States.
Well, perhaps it won't.