In my opinion, these "Pro-Life" arguments were in the main NOT about state's rights, or fetal rights, etc. This political movement was conceived as a means of negating the potential power of independent women, who are seen as threats by the "traditional" white, "Christian moralistic patriarchy. The dark money funding the "Pro-Life" mov…
In my opinion, these "Pro-Life" arguments were in the main NOT about state's rights, or fetal rights, etc. This political movement was conceived as a means of negating the potential power of independent women, who are seen as threats by the "traditional" white, "Christian moralistic patriarchy. The dark money funding the "Pro-Life" movement finds that a male, predominantly white, Christo-moralistic demographic easier to control and convince of the necessity of using dirty fossil fuels, crushing unions and any thoughts of opposing corporate or owner power and limiting the vote to this same demographic. "Others" like independent women, non-white men and women are harder to control by these elites and hence their power to vote, and to even have the ability to make their own medical decisions must be stamped out.
In my opinion, these "Pro-Life" arguments were in the main NOT about state's rights, or fetal rights, etc. This political movement was conceived as a means of negating the potential power of independent women, who are seen as threats by the "traditional" white, "Christian moralistic patriarchy. The dark money funding the "Pro-Life" movement finds that a male, predominantly white, Christo-moralistic demographic easier to control and convince of the necessity of using dirty fossil fuels, crushing unions and any thoughts of opposing corporate or owner power and limiting the vote to this same demographic. "Others" like independent women, non-white men and women are harder to control by these elites and hence their power to vote, and to even have the ability to make their own medical decisions must be stamped out.