I know many will not agree with me, but frankly, this is why I have never been in favor of a total ban on guns. Reasonalby restrictions, yes, but an armed citizenry is the last defense against tyranny.
I know many will not agree with me, but frankly, this is why I have never been in favor of a total ban on guns. Reasonalby restrictions, yes, but an armed citizenry is the last defense against tyranny.
Dudley, you're right, logical and reasonable. But is current indiscriminate gun ownership representative of "a well regulated militia," per the Constitution? It seems more like an unregulated free-for-all with no restrictions on any kind of weaponry, including attack weapons designed for all-out war. Tell me I'm wrong. I try to learn from my misteaks.
I know many will not agree with me, but frankly, this is why I have never been in favor of a total ban on guns. Reasonalby restrictions, yes, but an armed citizenry is the last defense against tyranny.
Dudley, you're right, logical and reasonable. But is current indiscriminate gun ownership representative of "a well regulated militia," per the Constitution? It seems more like an unregulated free-for-all with no restrictions on any kind of weaponry, including attack weapons designed for all-out war. Tell me I'm wrong. I try to learn from my misteaks.