But the microeconomics are not equally good across the economy. Fantastic for upper income and wealthy households, but middle class can't buy or rent a home? Can't afford college? Those are very significant problems.
Isn't it weird then that voters so motivated by housing would vote against the candidate proposing a $10,000 first-time home buyers tax credit in favor of the candidate proposing ... literally nothing?
A bull's eye on a garbage can maybe.
How many charts do you want me to post to show you that the economy was actually in historically good condition?
But the microeconomics are not equally good across the economy. Fantastic for upper income and wealthy households, but middle class can't buy or rent a home? Can't afford college? Those are very significant problems.
Isn't it weird then that voters so motivated by housing would vote against the candidate proposing a $10,000 first-time home buyers tax credit in favor of the candidate proposing ... literally nothing?