The issue is not the 5th circuit, the issue is reception of a speaker at a law school. The secondary issue is whether officials at the law school failed their duty to keep order in a lecture hall so that a speaker could be heard, and if the format permitted, questioned on their views. We do not care about first causes as rationalization for uncivil behavior by the listeners or the speaker.
The issue is not the 5th circuit, the issue is reception of a speaker at a law school. The secondary issue is whether officials at the law school failed their duty to keep order in a lecture hall so that a speaker could be heard, and if the format permitted, questioned on their views. We do not care about first causes as rationalization for uncivil behavior by the listeners or the speaker.
The issue is not the 5th circuit, the issue is reception of a speaker at a law school. The secondary issue is whether officials at the law school failed their duty to keep order in a lecture hall so that a speaker could be heard, and if the format permitted, questioned on their views. We do not care about first causes as rationalization for uncivil behavior by the listeners or the speaker.