Although I definitely can see Ben's point about what this CIty Bank take back might portend, I have a different thought. What if the point of waiting for the funds to be dispersed and then called back is the legal question? Since the funds have been dispersed, Congresses' Constitutional obligations have been met, and if the Executive wan…
Although I definitely can see Ben's point about what this CIty Bank take back might portend, I have a different thought. What if the point of waiting for the funds to be dispersed and then called back is the legal question? Since the funds have been dispersed, Congresses' Constitutional obligations have been met, and if the Executive wants to call it back, oh well, too bad, so sad. I can think of more than two SCOTUS justices who will bite at that worm.
Although I definitely can see Ben's point about what this CIty Bank take back might portend, I have a different thought. What if the point of waiting for the funds to be dispersed and then called back is the legal question? Since the funds have been dispersed, Congresses' Constitutional obligations have been met, and if the Executive wants to call it back, oh well, too bad, so sad. I can think of more than two SCOTUS justices who will bite at that worm.
Minor correction: Disbursed, not dispersed.