The Bulwark

The Bulwark

Home
Shows
Newsletters
Chat
Special Projects
Events
Founders
Store
Archive
About

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Presidency as Performance Art
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from The Bulwark
The Bulwark is home to Sarah Longwell, Tim Miller, Bill Kristol, JVL, Sam Stein, and more. We are the largest pro-democracy bundle on Substack for news and analysis on politics and culture—supported by a community built on good-faith.
Over 827,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

The Presidency as Performance Art

Why govern when you can pose?

George Thomas's avatar
George Thomas
Jun 16, 2020

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Presidency as Performance Art
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
(Shutterstock / GettyImages)

Donald Trump is a real president, though mostly he seems to enjoy playing the role of ā€œPresident Trumpā€ on Twitter (and TV). His recent stunt, using force to clear Lafayette Square of peaceful protesters so he could snap a photo of himself in front of St. John’s Episcopal Church holding a Bible, is only the most grotesque example of his performance art.

Using the Bible as a prop, not a book of wisdom or instruction that might offer illumination or healing, is altogether consistent with his presidency. And if you listen to him talk about the Bible, it’s clear he has no idea what’s inside. (Ditto the Constitution.)

It's been that way since he descended from the gold escalator at Trump Tower to announce he was running for president, where he blathered on about all manner of nonsense. He knew nothing about anything. A month later, he insisted John McCain wasn’t a war hero because, you know, war heroes don’t get captured. What did that statement even mean? It was ignorant of history, the lawful rules of combat, and how war actually works—not to mention moral sense, human empathy, and patriotism.

But meaning wasn’t really the point. The point was the performative act of saying something outrageous. Like generations of avant-garde artistes before him, the point of Trump’s art is not to make an argument or do something constructive. It’s to Ć©pater la bourgeoisie.

And so it has been for the last four years—which only seems like since time immemorial.


This style—politics as performance art—is the hallmark of the Trump aesthetic, embraced by MAGA world intellects, citizens, and politicians.

The Flight 93 Election? The idea was preposterous on its face: An intellectually preening essay, dressed up with citations to political philosophy. It was not a proposal, but a pose.

The idea that the banal Hillary Clinton was an existential threat to the American constitutional experiment was, even then, pathetically silly. The idea that stopping her required the intervention of the deeply illiberal, ignorant, and inexperienced Donald Trump even sillier. Worse, large swaths of the essay were devoted to an illiberal political understanding completely at odds with American constitutionalism. From the overwrought metaphor, we already get a sense of an executive that owes more to Carl Schmitt than Alexander Hamilton. Let forth the forces of illiberalism to save America’s liberal constitutional order?

Again: This isn’t a treatise. It’s performance art.


The groundlings are in on the act, too. Witness the Trump supporters who play army dress-up at rallies and protests. Their long guns aren’t tools for protection. They’re stage props that enable the MAGA-heads to play-act at being saviors of the Republic.

Just a few weeks ago, armed protesters in Michigan gathered at the capitol building in Lansing, protesting Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s stay-at-home order. They chanted ā€œLock her up!ā€

ā€œLock her upā€ was originally used by Trump supporters as a rallying cry demanding that Hillary Clinton be sent to prison for various alleged criminal acts. In the case of Whitmer, there were no alleged criminal acts. It was like the cosplay militia were simply staging a revue of Trump’s greatest hits—like some sad, off, off, off-Broadway jukebox musical.

Others chanted ā€œLet us in!ā€ and made vague attempts to force their way onto the floor of the state legislature, where Michigan’s elected legislators were debating whether or not to extend Governor Whitmer’s order.

Ask yourself this: What would these people have done if they had forced their way through the police?

Point their rifles at the legislators and demand repeal of the governor’s executive order? Shoot the legislators if they didn’t? Hold the governor hostage?

But of course, the answer is: None of these things. That’s why they only pretended to try to force their way in and were happy to be turned away. This was nothing more than play-acting as revolutionaries. And why only play-acting? Because these people understand as well as you and I do that they have the right to peacefully protest. They can vote. They can file lawsuits. In other words, they have all of the tools of our constitutional republic available to them in order to get redress for their grievances and they would have had these tools even if they had stayed at home.

The weapons, like the confederate flags and nooses, were all just part of a performance.


It’s curious that Sen. Tom Cotton had nothing to say about the armed Michigan protesters who literally went inside the state’s capitol.

You may recall that Sen. Cotton has been eager to show force against any sign of ā€œinsurrection,ā€ even going so far to call for the deployment of the military in American cities.

Yet that call only materialized after the men with guns had left the Michigan statehouse. Cotton’s call for ā€œno quarterā€ for protesters was only for the unarmed protesters on the public streets of Washington, D.C.

So we are to believe that Cotton had no fears of an ā€œinsurrectionā€ against these protesters:

(Scott Olson/Getty Images)

But against these protesters, he wanted to call in the 101st Airborne, offering ā€œno quarterā€ā€”that is, killing rather than taking prisoners.

(Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

Using American soldiers to kill looters and arsonists would be ridiculous if Cotton had been serious. But he wasn’t. As an aspiring heir to Trumpism, he was merely engaged in a masterful piece of performance art. Though, to be fair to Cotton, his intended audience was not the bourgeoisie, but the Trumpenproletariat, who remain suspicious that he might, after all, not be one of them.

It’s a sad state of affairs where a man like Cotton—genuinely brave and genuinely smart—must stage kabuki exhibitions in order to convince his would-be supporters that he is something else.

But this is where we are. Trump has invited a postmodern play into our politics. He doesn't care about values, truth, or justice. Republicans and conservative intellectuals play along—indeed, the truly virtuous of MAGA world actually egg him on. Even as he encourages extralegal violence.

Our real president who prefers being a pretend president has unleashed a deeply illiberal and undemocratic strand of politics and thinking into the American theater.

And the sophisticates laughed, thinking that it was all a game.

Until people got hurt.


Subscribe to The Bulwark

Tens of thousands of paid subscribers
The Bulwark is home to Sarah Longwell, Tim Miller, Bill Kristol, JVL, Sam Stein, and more. We are the largest pro-democracy bundle on Substack for news and analysis on politics and culture—supported by a community built on good-faith.

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The Presidency as Performance Art
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
A guest post by
George Thomas
George Thomas is the Wohlford Professor of American Political Institutions at Claremont McKenna College and the author of ā€˜The (Un)Written Constitution’ (Oxford, 2021) and ā€˜The Founders and the Idea of a National University’ (Cambridge, 2014).
Subscribe to George
The American Age Is Over
Emergency Triad: The United States commits imperial suicide.
Apr 3 ā€¢ 
Jonathan V. Last
5,336

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
The American Age Is Over
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1,469
How to Think (and Act) Like a Dissident Movement
AOC, solidarity, and people power.
Mar 24 ā€¢ 
Jonathan V. Last
4,101

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
How to Think (and Act) Like a Dissident Movement
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1,170
ā€œHow Can You Look at Yourself in the Mirror?ā€
George is furious.
Apr 3 ā€¢ 
Sarah Longwell
2,102

Share this post

The Bulwark
The Bulwark
ā€œHow Can You Look at Yourself in the Mirror?ā€
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
349
49:37

Ready for more?

Ā© 2025 Bulwark Media
Privacy āˆ™ Terms āˆ™ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More