I subscribed in part because I was curious what you'd say about this topic. I'm solidly pro-choice, and disagree with lots of your politics, but appreciated one of your books and figured this might make interesting reading. It does.
I'm going to echo one of the statements others made -- the key issue is that you had a good outcome because…
I subscribed in part because I was curious what you'd say about this topic. I'm solidly pro-choice, and disagree with lots of your politics, but appreciated one of your books and figured this might make interesting reading. It does.
I'm going to echo one of the statements others made -- the key issue is that you had a good outcome because you choose to bring your child into this world and to raise them. The state can't force this, and shouldn't, and that's part of why removing choice is a bad idea.
Until recently I've always felt the obvious position was that we should aim to make abortions legal but rare. But if this cedes moral ground in a way that's brought us to the current point, maybe that was an error.
I subscribed in part because I was curious what you'd say about this topic. I'm solidly pro-choice, and disagree with lots of your politics, but appreciated one of your books and figured this might make interesting reading. It does.
I'm going to echo one of the statements others made -- the key issue is that you had a good outcome because you choose to bring your child into this world and to raise them. The state can't force this, and shouldn't, and that's part of why removing choice is a bad idea.
Until recently I've always felt the obvious position was that we should aim to make abortions legal but rare. But if this cedes moral ground in a way that's brought us to the current point, maybe that was an error.