As a Californian, I recognize this "willingness to do harm" by our Democratic electeds and their willful disregard for the societal consequences of their ideology, from crime to homelessness. So how much worse is it that Gavin Newsom, for one, not only tolerates but advocates policies that are proven not to work and that even make the problems worse? How are these two things different?
As a Californian, I recognize this "willingness to do harm" by our Democratic electeds and their willful disregard for the societal consequences of their ideology, from crime to homelessness. So how much worse is it that Gavin Newsom, for one, not only tolerates but advocates policies that are proven not to work and that even make the problems worse? How are these two things different?
As a Californian, I recognize this "willingness to do harm" by our Democratic electeds and their willful disregard for the societal consequences of their ideology, from crime to homelessness. So how much worse is it that Gavin Newsom, for one, not only tolerates but advocates policies that are proven not to work and that even make the problems worse? How are these two things different?