11 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Maggie's avatar

Soft power is a complicated thing to explain to voters, and honestly I doubt more than 30% of voters can comprehend how soft power benefits them (that's being generous). It's a nebulous concept that takes decades of investment to pay dividends.

Everyone should understand that USAID is nice. The concept can be made into a slogan or a bumper sticker. A starving child, an HIV-positive baby, a pregnant woman in need of a hospital: none of these are abstractions. A dumb person can understand that these are bad outcomes that can be prevented with pennies of their tax dollars.

JVL says our voters are dumb, and I believe this to be a correct interpretation. But if they are dumb and mean, then I think we as a country are beyond redemption.

Expand full comment
Douglas Paul Truhlar's avatar

It’s just carrot and stick, simple at the base level, playground of atomic land mines for tramp to do that awful dance around the atomic mine field. JV you are a great writer.

Expand full comment
Katy Namovicz's avatar

Certainly the "leaders" they have elected are both dumb and mean...

Expand full comment
John A. Steenbergen's avatar

Or evil and mean. In Trump's case, narcissistic, sociopathic, Machiavellian, ignorant and mean, but probably with at least average intelligence.

Expand full comment
No Sympathy, No Charity's avatar

A way to explain it could be that soft power, specifically exporting our culture, is what is has currently put China in that bind that it’s in. Currently, China faces a marriage and fertility scarcity. The reason is women are fighting for equality in both the personal and professional realm. That has put China in a precarious position geopolitically and put it behind the 8-ball in their competition for global hegemony with us.

Expand full comment
Danielle NJ's avatar

I am not sure I believe that it cannot be explained to a group that is attracted to a mob-adjacent demagogue. I'm not convinced it cannot be explained to a part of the coalition that is engaged in business ownership.

Expand full comment
Colleen Kochivar-Baker's avatar

Bill Gates had the best explanation for the work of the Gates Foundation in Africa. He said a lot of it had to with making sure he had future customers in the world's next expanding economy.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Weber's avatar

Here's how they could explain it. The best boss understands what needs to get done, but they have a calm and considerate way of communicating with people. a mean boss has hard power and nothing else. the best bosses have both the hard power to fire you and the soft power to support you.

Expand full comment
SandyG's avatar

Agree, Kathleen. Good management is two-headed. When I worked in the private sector, I got a lot of management training. I remember an x and y graph that explained good management of employees: The relationship is on one axis and the task to be done is on the other. You want both.

Expand full comment
Howard Covert's avatar

It's great this came up. I've tried to explain how in so many ways Trump falls short if viewed as a leader/manager.

A good leader:

Articulates visions that inspire his/her team

Listens and empathizes

Speaks truth - especially to power

Holds him/herself accountable

Credits others for the success of his/her team

Welcomes and even seeks out those who disagree with him/her

Plans several steps ahead

Challenges his/her core beliefs

Challenges the assumptions behind his decisions

Trump falls laughably short - EXCEPT on the vision piece - and in a very specific way.

He is excellent at reading his audience and selling them on something. The power of the Trump narrative - even if based on complete BS - boggles my mind.

Expand full comment
ErrorError