If I understand you correctly, her avowed commitment to ensure the 45th president's defeat is not sufficiently robust to include activity directly in support of the only candidate who can defeat the 45th president.
Which is to say, she will continue to make the case that Republican nominee must NOT win, but will not embrace the inescapable corollary.
If I understand you correctly, her avowed commitment to ensure the 45th president's defeat is not sufficiently robust to include activity directly in support of the only candidate who can defeat the 45th president.
Which is to say, she will continue to make the case that Republican nominee must NOT win, but will not embrace the inescapable corollary.
Maybe.
If I understand you correctly, her avowed commitment to ensure the 45th president's defeat is not sufficiently robust to include activity directly in support of the only candidate who can defeat the 45th president.
Which is to say, she will continue to make the case that Republican nominee must NOT win, but will not embrace the inescapable corollary.
Perhaps all will become clear – and soon!