
āIf you donāt think that moving from Kevin McCarthy to MAGA Mike Johnson shows the ascendance of this movement and where the power in the Republican Party truly lies, then youāre not paying attention,ā ā Matt Gaetz to Steve Bannon Wednesday morning.
And of course, he was right.
Matt Gaetz may be loathed and detested by his colleagues, but in the end, it was Gaetz and his fellow members of the Crazed Slavering Jackal Caucus who feasted on the carcass of the GOP normies.
Gaetz and his confederates blew up the House, destroyed Kevin McCarthy, torpedoed Steve Scalise, and watched Trump shiv Tom Emmer. They bullied. harassed, and exhausted the majority, and on Wednesday they got a full-throated election denier and coup-plotter as speaker.
For a few halcyon moments, it looked like the center would hold as a modest rump of āmoderatesā blocked the ludicrous Jim Jordan. But in the end, the squishes did what squishes do; and their defeat was as comprehensive as it was condign.
Adam Kinzinger describes the fifth-string Johnson as āJordan in drag.ā Or at least a jacket. But the distinction hardly matters.
Gaetz has given Trump his speaker.
As I explained yesterday, Johnson is no garden variety election denier. The NYT described him as āthe most important architectā of the attempt to overturn Trumpās electoral college loss. In December 2020, he was in close contact with Trump about the (bogus) lawsuit that would have thrown out tens of millions of votes.
But even this understates the case.
Johnson fully-embraced the wooliest of the Kraken-level conspiracy theories including the bizarre lie that voting software came from āHugo Chavezās Venezuela.ā
In a radio interview days after the November 2020 vote, Johnson said:
āIn every election in American history, thereās some small element of fraud, irregularity, error. We just know that. You just accept that thatās the case,ā acknowledged Johnson before pressing on:
But when you have it on a broad scale, when you have, you know a software system that is used all around the country that is suspect because it came from Hugo Chavezās Venezuela. When you have, you know, testimonials of people like this but in large numbers, it begs to be litigated and investigated. And the problem is, itās exceedingly difficult to do that in a 45-day time window. You know, and thatās the problem that weāre up against.
And thatās why the president is so frustrated and thatās why so many, so many 71, 73 million Americans around the country feel like the election was stolen from them.
āThe allegations about these voting machines, some of them being rigged with this software by Dominion. Look, thereās a lot of merit to that. And when the president says the election is rigged, thatās what heās talking about,ā remarked Johnson at another point.
In another instance, Johnson said that his colleagues from Georgia were āso frustrated they want to pull their hair outā because āthey know that in Georgia it really was rigged.ā
Those were the kind of lies that cost Fox News $787 million; and that resulted in felony indictments for the biggest peddlers ā and now guilty pleas from Jenna Ellis, Sydney Powell, and Kenneth Chesebro.
For Mike Johnson, however, they were a ladder.
On Wednesday not a single Republican voted against him. Not one. Not Mike Gallagher. Not Ken Buck. Not Mike Lawler.
Not one of the normies who rail about Trumpās insanity caucus in private; not one of the representatives who knows that Gaetz is a walking political hemorrhoid. Every one of them fell into line.
And when Johnson was asked about his support for the coup:
Thatās the whole party in one clip. Thereās Johnson, smug at having been not merely absolved by his colleagues for abetting a coup attempt but commended for it with their nomination for speaker. Thereās Scalise and Elise Stefanik, two members of leadership leering like gargoyles at the idea that they should care about the partyās turn toward insurrectionism. And thereās Virginia Foxx, one of the elder statesmen in the conference, goading the press to just shut up about it already.
Participants, enablers, apologists. Thatās the House GOP. Theyāve moved on from their attempt to block the peaceful transfer of power, theyāre eager for you to know āunlike a certain someone for whom theyāll all be campaigning three or four months from now.
The reasons for the normie surrender were many and sundry. Most of them were bullsh*t on stilts.
Just last week, Rep. Ken Buck declared on CNN: "I don't want someone who was involved in the activities of January 6 ... There's no way we win the majority if the message we send to the American people is we believe the election was stolen, and we believe that January 6 was a tour of the Capitol."
On Wednesday, like everyone else, he fell in line for Johnson.
But, as Ramesh Ponnuru noted yesterday: āKen Buck's support for Rep. Mike Johnson for Speaker renders his votes and statements over the last three weeks ridiculous. Johnson organized the brief urging the Supreme Court to overturn the election.ā
Perhaps the purest specimen of piffle came from the Grift World of No Labels.
Members associated with No Labels, the centrist political organization plotting a third-party presidential bid, are singing the praises of newly minted House Speaker Mike Johnson ā casting him as, at least temperamentally, a moderate.
āHeās a Reagan Republican, not a Trump Republican,ā said Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) in a Zoom call organized by No Labels and attended by a few hundred of the groupās supporters. Fitzpatrick is part of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus that is backed by No Labels.
My colleague Tim Miller begs to differ:
**
BONUS:
Exit take: Even with the election of a new speaker, the dysfunction continues. Because that was the plan.
āI find that the witness is not credible.ā
How was Trumpās day in court? CNN sums it up: āInside the courtroom as Donald Trump is forced to take the stand, is fined and then storms out.ā
Judge Arthur Engoron has fined Trump $10,000 after holding a brief hearing in which he called the ex-president to testify about his possible violation of a gag order this morning. Engoron previously ordered Trump not to make disparaging comments about his staff; in commentary this morning, Trump appeared to make one such statement about Engoronās law clerk.
Trump denied that he was speaking about Engoronās clerk, and insisted he was speaking about Michael Cohen. Engoron disagreed.
āAs the trier of fact I find that the witness is not credible,ā Engoron said in imposing the fine.
On Earth 2.0 this would be a big deal, right?
**
Meanwhile, in Washington D.C., Special Counsel Jack Smith is asking Judge Chutkan to reimpose her gag order on the former president:
āThe defendant has capitalized on the courtās administrative stay to, among other prejudicial conduct, send an unmistakable and threatening message to a foreseeable witness in this case,ā wrote Molly Gaston, a prosecutor. āUnless the court lifts the administrative stay, the defendant will not stop his harmful and prejudicial attacks.ā
In accusing Mr. Trump of persistently breaking the now-paused order, Ms. Gaston pointed to a social media message that the former president posted on Tuesday night, lashing out at Mr. Smith and dissecting statements attributed to Mr. Meadows in a news article.
Mr. Trumpās message also called the various people who have cooperated with the authorities in some of the prosecutions he is facing ācowardsā and āweaklings.ā
āI donāt think that Mark Meadows is one of them,ā Mr. Trump wrote, ābut who really knows?ā
This will keep happeningā¦
āAt least 22 killed, dozens wounded in Maine mass shooting.ā
And nothing will happen.
**
But weāll get more of this wonāt we?
Moral Depravity Update
The Ultimate Condescension Toward Palestinians
John McWhorter in The Free Press:
Some leftists are framing Hamasās killing of 1,400 Israelis and abduction of 222 more as ādecolonization,ā believing theyāre championing the cause of oppressed Palestinians. In reality, these leftists are condescending to them.
Mass murder, these leftists suggest, is the understandable consequence of Jewish ācolonization.ā Such a perspective is deeply insulting to Palestinian humanity. It implies that Palestinians are so controlled by circumstance that they lack agency. It implies that Palestinians cannot be expected to behave according to the same ethical standards of those who refrain from mass murder.
The argument that terrorism is an understandable or justifiable reaction to an insidious root cause is nothing new. Just days after 9/11, Susan Sontag infamously criticized public figures and TV commentators for feeding the American people āself-righteous drivel and outright deceptionsā about the terrorist attacks. Far from a ācowardlyā attack on ācivilizationā or āliberty,ā she argued that the attack that killed nearly 3,000 civilians was in fact a strike against āthe worldās self-proclaimed superpower, undertaken as a consequence of specific American alliances and actions.ā
The implication, not unique to Sontag but prevalent among some on the left, is that the act of killing thousands of civilians en masse and unawares is āunderstandableā if the perpetrators are Arab. There is a kind of patronizing racism in the idea that slaughtering innocent people equates to noble freedom fighting, as if this were the only way to respond to oppression.
BONUS:
Quick Hits
1. Trouble for Trump: Mark Meadows Talks
Kim Wehle in todayās Bulwark:
Meadowsās cooperation is significant for a number of reasons, including that he was at the heart of everything related to the Trump āStop the Stealā effort, including the pressure campaign on Vice President Mike Pence and the fake electors scheme in several states. (Recall that Meadows is part of the Fulton County indictment for allegedly helping to set up the call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, during which Trump pressed Raffensperger to āfind 11,780 votes . . . because we won the state.ā) Letās not forget, too, that Meadowsās own chief of staff, Cassidy Hutchinson, told the House January 6th Committee that Meadows burned documents in his office fireplace at least a dozen times between December 2020 and mid-January 2021. She also said he told staffers to keep certain Oval Office meetings a āclose holdāāmeaning off the books.
2. No, Congress Should Not Make Qualified Immunity the Law of the Land
Christian Lansinger in this morningās Bulwark:
LAST WEEK, THE AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE (AFPI), one of several new policy groups run by acolytes of Donald Trump, published a report calling for Congress to codify āqualified immunityā nationwide. The reportās author, an alumnus of the Trump Department of Homeland Security, Scott G. Erickson, argues that police officers need special legal protections so they can keep their communities safe, that eliminating qualified immunity would be dangerous, and that legislators could find a way to address āthe concerns of accountability and transparencyā while also lastingly making qualified immunity the law of the land.
But enshrining qualified immunity does not, so to speak, place Americans first. Instead, it places all government officialsāprosecutors, agency bureaucrats, and yes, police officersāfirst, and the American people last.
I realize that āHope Springs Eternalā, but can we once and for all stop talking about the ānormiesā in todayās Republican Party?
Seriously, the unanimous election of a MAGA Speaker of the House reminds me of Hitlerās legal path to power. THIS is the scariest moment Iāve had for our country and our people, since it all began in 2015. First, it was okay because off-camera the ānormiesā all said the right things ā they were as shocked and disgusted as the rest of us. Then they started down-playing the severity of what we were seeing and hearing with our own eyes and ears. Then they started going along to get along, but āassuringā us that it wasnāt as bad as we thought.
NEVER speak to me again about the ānormiesā in terms of the rock and the hard place they find themselves in, poor dearsā¦. Hostages of trump and his MAGA baseā¦. Itās of their own making and they will eventually succeed in bringing down our Republic, our Democracy, our Constitution. For what? Greed, power, relevance, job security, cowardice?
If youāre willing to trade your party (and our country) for an authoritarian movement, you deserve nothing but CONDEMNATION. PERIOD. History (if indeed it survives), will be clear-eyed about it, and so should all of us, starting here, starting nowā¦.
Perhaps the professionals should take a cue from JVL. Stop writing about the polls showing people think Biden is too old ā start writing about why Bidenās experience is precisely what we need at this very hour of our nationās peril.
We have barely 12 months left to turn the tide, and hopefully save what we value and cherish, not only for ourselves, but for our children, grandchildren, and all generations to come. We best heed the callā¦. EACH and EVERY ONE of USā¦.
Call me crazy, but I think there's an opportunity here for the Democrats.
First of all, the House GOP members really don't like each other all that much. The only thing that unites them is a hatred for everyone who doesn't look, sound, and think like they do. I don't think it'll take a lot of work to get them to turn on each other.
Secondly, Johnson has benefited from being in the shadows. Now that the spotlight is on him, it's time to put the screws to him. Fundamentalist types like him are very closed minded and they don't like having their beliefs challenged. Use that against him. Take his "faith" and turn it against him at every moment.