Agree. Also McConnell just said that he's willing to entertain a federal abortion ban, so seems like Heer is right on that. I also don't know how you can read that draft opinion and not come away from it with the idea that the Court doesn't strongly believe in privacy or individual liberty. The idea that Obergefell is safe seems bizarr…
Agree. Also McConnell just said that he's willing to entertain a federal abortion ban, so seems like Heer is right on that. I also don't know how you can read that draft opinion and not come away from it with the idea that the Court doesn't strongly believe in privacy or individual liberty. The idea that Obergefell is safe seems bizarre. I know we were told by a lot of moderates and conservatives that we shouldn't worry our little heads about Roe and that suggesting it would be overruled was fearmongering and hysteria. ...
Agree. Also McConnell just said that he's willing to entertain a federal abortion ban, so seems like Heer is right on that. I also don't know how you can read that draft opinion and not come away from it with the idea that the Court doesn't strongly believe in privacy or individual liberty. The idea that Obergefell is safe seems bizarre. I know we were told by a lot of moderates and conservatives that we shouldn't worry our little heads about Roe and that suggesting it would be overruled was fearmongering and hysteria. ...
Right. Cause these folks are such fans of stare decisis when an opinion has grey hair.
They also said that about the attempted coup on 1/6, but hey let’s be stupid and believe them now.
I mean, Lucy might hold the football still this time, right?