Did DeSantis Really Think This Through?
Plus: Trump's "special master" buyer's remorse
Three thoughts to consider this morning:
You really wouldnāt want to be the guy around Mar-a-Lago who came up with the idea for a āspecial masterā.
Maybe Ron DeSantis didnāt really think through this whole flying-migrants-around-the-country thing.
Trumpās weekend rally was worse than you thought.
Happy Tuesday.
Letās start with Team Trumpās apparent buyerās remorse over the special master they wanted and chose. Judge Raymond Dearie asked Trump to ādisclose details about any materials he claims to have declassified before calling them his property.ā
Trump is balking, complaining:
ā[T]he Special Master process will have forced the Plaintiff to fully and specifically disclose a defense to the merits of any subsequent indictment without such a requirement being evident in the District Courtās order,ā the attorneys wrote.
Oh.
Thereās more. Trump is worried that Dearie is moving too fast, arguing that his draft plan for review ācompresses the entirety of the inspection and labeling process to be completed by October 7, 2022.ā
Andā¦
Trumpās team also raised concerns about Dearieās request for information about whether any subsequent Fourth Amendment litigation filed by Trump to reclaim the documents should be filed with the magistrate judge who authorized the search in the first place: Bruce Reinhart, who Trump has assailed without basis as biased against him.
As Politicoās Kyle Cheney notes:
The back and forth comes a day before Trump will make his first bid to convince an appeals court panel to grant him the same deference that Cannon did when she blocked the Justice Departmentās criminal review of the national security secrets stashed at his Mar-a-Lago home.
Exit take:
**
The DeSantis Investigation
Itās still early days, but this could get messy: āTexas sheriff opens criminal investigation into Martha's Vineyard migrant trips.ā
[Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar] said ā¦ that 48 migrants appeared to have been ālured under false pretensesā into staying at a hotel for a couple of days before they were flown to Florida and Marthaās Vineyard.
āThey were promised work,ā he said. āThey were promised the solution to several of their problems.ā
He said a recruiter was paid a "bird dog fee" to gather roughly 50 people around a San Antonio migrant resource center.
The asylum-seekers, most of them Venezuelan, were then taken to the posh Massachusetts island āfor little more than a photo op or a video op, and they were unceremoniously stranded in Marthaās Vineyard,ā Salazar said.
Salazar said his office's organized crime investigators would handle the investigation.
Maybe the feds should get involved, as well?
Speaking of the DeSantis stunt, read Linda Chavez in todayās Bulwark: āThe Cruelty and Dishonesty of the DeSantis Immigration Stunt.ā
Also: Make sure you check out Judd Legumās exposĆ©, which JVL summarized yesterday:
None of the migrants were in the U.S. illegally. They were claiming asylum from the regime in Venezuela that DeSantis himself says āis responsible for countless atrocities.ā
DeSantis and his agents lied to the asylum seekers in order to get them aboard the planes. They told the Venezuelan refugees that they were going to Boston in order to get expedited work papers.
DeSantis and officials in his administration then lied to the public, insisting that they did not mislead the refugees.
Legum has a copy of the brochure that the refugees were given:
Popular Information, however, has obtained a brochure that was provided to the migrants who ultimately agreed to the flights. It was provided to Popular Information by Lawyers for Civil Rights (LCR), a Boston-based legal organization that represents 30 of the migrants.
The brochure says that migrants who arrive in Massachusetts will be eligible for numerous benefits, including "8 months cash assistance," "assistance with housing," "food," "clothing," "transportation to job interviews," "job training," "job placement," "registering children for school," "assistance applying for Social Security cards," and many other benefits.
None of this, however, is true.
**
Over at the Dispatch, Nick Catoggio (the pundit formerly known as Allahpundit) takes a deep-dive into the complicated Trump-DeSantis dynamic.
At some point an impatient narcissist will no longer be able to ignore his rivalās effrontery, especially if itās cutting into his camera time. Itās one thing for DeSantis to steal Trumpās hand gestures, itās another for him to steal the policy issue on which Trump has made his bones as a āfighter.ā The day Trump loses his distinction as āKing of the Jerksā to DeSantis is the day we have a bona fide fight on our hands for the 2024 nomination.
Which is one reason I think his patience with DeSantisāhis willingness to hold his tongue about the younger manāis about to run out.
**
Trumpās New Recruits
Must-read from Tom Nichols in the Atlantic:
Saturday nightās Ohio rally was not a typical Trump carnival, and it was not just ridiculousāit was dangerous. His embrace of the QAnon conspiracy theorists represents a new expansion not only of Trumpās cult of personality, but of his threats to sow violence.
Despite his seeming inability to remember anything from one thought to the next, Trump has a kind of lizard-brain awareness of dangerāonly to himself, of courseāthat guides him when heās faced with threats. His reflex in such situations is to do whatever it takes to survive, including bullying, lying, threatening, and allegedly breaking the law.
He is in political and legal jeopardy now, and he has decided to escalate his war against the rule of law, the American system of government, and the American people by embracing and potentially weaponizing QAnon.
Quick Hits
1. How the Second Civil War Could Start
Grim, but important, read from Major Garrett and David Becker, excerpted from their new book, āThe Big Truth: Upholding Democracy in the Age of āThe Big Lieāā ā which is out today.
Americaās second civil war could start with a bang or with a whimper. It could begin with a skirmish or sneak up on us through a series of small compromises and acts of political cowardice. Civil war could announce itself loudly and bloodily, leaving no doubt as to its awful entrance. Or it could creep in through the back door, only to be recognized in hindsight as a series of seemingly disconnected events that could have and should have been stopped. We may be midstream in such a flow of events already. We now examine this possible future as if we have just emerged from its aftermath.
2. The Chaotic Politics of Lindsey Grahamās Abortion Bill
Republicans had a strategy for downplaying the issue through the midterms, writes Will Saletan. So much for that.
If youāre devoutly pro-life, it can be exhilarating to watch a politician flaunt his resolve to prohibit all abortions in every state. But if youāre pro-choice, itās alarming. And if youāre McConnell, itās a headache. McConnell just wants to make things easy on Republican senators and Senate candidates. He doesnāt want Ron Johnson, Mehmet Oz, Adam Laxalt, and other purple-state GOP nominees to be put on the spot about a federal ban.
Apparently, Graham does. In the interview, he exhorted pro-lifers to hold Republican lawmakersā feet to the fire. Without using McConnellās name, he called for a direct assault on McConnellās position. āHereās the question for the pro-life movement: Are you going to accept the Republican party who tells you Washington is out of business?ā Graham asked. āI donāt think you will. I donāt think you should.ā
3. Why Bill Barr Turned on Trump
Donald Ayer writes that no one should think Barr is having second thoughts about the awful things he did in office.
Credit for moving the public discussion closer to reality is one thing, but no one should think that Barr is having second thoughts about the awful things he did in office. To the contrary, Barrās recent trashing of Trump in a manner likely to greatly impair his presidential prospects makes perfect sense when one understands the driving convictions and objectives that have guided him throughout his adult life.
4. The Power of Words and the Need to Protect Free Speech
In todayās Bulwark, Cathy Young writes about a recent PEN symposium:
Obviously, most writers working in liberal democracies in 2022 are not in danger of being sentenced to death in absentia for their writings, or of being confronted by a fanatical and armed would-be enforcer of that sentence. (A Twitter death threat is not quite the same thing.) And yet the theme of free expression in jeopardy, not just in dictatorships but here in the United States, dominated the discussion. In her introductory remarks, Nossel noted that PEN America was committed to resisting encroachments on speech from both right and left, be they attempts to remove unwelcome books (particularly ones with LGBT themes) from school libraries or pressure to restrict free speech on college campuses.
This political evenhandedness was evident through the evening. The so-called library wars, which sometimes include actual and disturbing harassment from the right as well as illiberal legislative action, were repeatedly and duly noted; Ayad Akhtar even asserted that we are āin the midst of the most significant repression of free speech by American legislaturesā in his lifetime. And yet all in all, perhaps more attention was paidāat an unquestionably left-of-center gathering before a liberal New York audienceāto the dangers of zealotry on the social justice- and identity-focused left.
Cheap Shots
Sounds reasonable and not at all batshit crazy.
Meanwhile, in Georgia:
Democrats, Indpendents and moderate Republicans must come together for the next few election cycles to say Democracy Matters. This means some voters having to vote for Democrats, when they would prefer not to, but it also means the Democrats have to pursue more moderate and fiscally conservative policies when given the power. It's a coalition we must form for the sake of our country, and when the danger has passed, then we can go back to debating policy differences.
The NRO types are NOT liking this Bexar County Sheriff's investigation. Not one little bit, oh no.
These "Support the Blue" people all of a sudden are maybe for just a little bit of defunding.