Tim! I listened to your interview on The Dispatch. I thought you were perfectly delightful. Purposefully lighthearted, one might say. But ohhhhhh nooooo, not according to those Dispatch comments. (Just one step short of National Review comments, if you ask me). According to The Dispatch commenters you were endlessly condescending. I did …
Tim! I listened to your interview on The Dispatch. I thought you were perfectly delightful. Purposefully lighthearted, one might say. But ohhhhhh nooooo, not according to those Dispatch comments. (Just one step short of National Review comments, if you ask me). According to The Dispatch commenters you were endlessly condescending. I did not pick-up any trace of condescension. And I think this is what makes the difference between Bulwark and Dispatch people: Dispatch people are SUPER sensitive. I think it’s because they kinda…sorta…aren’t really offended by Trump the way us never-Trumpers are. Like…Dispatch people think Trump and Biden are equally as bad, but they subconsciously know how fucked-up that analysis is, and feel ashamed, and therefore the sensitivity to criticism. Am I wrong?
Tim! I listened to your interview on The Dispatch. I thought you were perfectly delightful. Purposefully lighthearted, one might say. But ohhhhhh nooooo, not according to those Dispatch comments. (Just one step short of National Review comments, if you ask me). According to The Dispatch commenters you were endlessly condescending. I did not pick-up any trace of condescension. And I think this is what makes the difference between Bulwark and Dispatch people: Dispatch people are SUPER sensitive. I think it’s because they kinda…sorta…aren’t really offended by Trump the way us never-Trumpers are. Like…Dispatch people think Trump and Biden are equally as bad, but they subconsciously know how fucked-up that analysis is, and feel ashamed, and therefore the sensitivity to criticism. Am I wrong?