When your ace closer walks the first four batters to let the tying run score in the bottom of the ninth, you have to pull him. That's what Biden did. I think he's the best president of my lifetime and would continue to be in a second term. But he is not up to the job of beating Trump. And if he cannot beat Trump, nothing else matters. Th…
When your ace closer walks the first four batters to let the tying run score in the bottom of the ninth, you have to pull him. That's what Biden did. I think he's the best president of my lifetime and would continue to be in a second term. But he is not up to the job of beating Trump. And if he cannot beat Trump, nothing else matters. That was the premise of his 2020 campaign. For the same reasons he stuck with it then, he needs to bow out now.
The only person who could beat Trump in a forum such as this is another reality tv performer. This is an act. His act is to show bullying strength, to hell with truth and diplomacy. His people don’t give a shit about that. Joe Biden is a person, not an actor. He presidents. That’s what he does. That’s what he should do. This “debate” was aimed for the trash heap of history from the getgo.
Some friends and I were discussing this and we came to the conclusion that going forward, presidential candidates need to be already famous as a performer of some sort. Like Zelensky. Like Reagan. Like Trump. You don't shoot a big-budget movie with unknown actors. You need star power.
Possibilities:
* Al Franken (but he shot his wad)
* John Stuart ( too lefty?)
* Steven Colbert
* Neil DeGrasse Tyson
* George Clooney
* Taylor Swift
* Steph Curry
* Dwayne Johnson
* Matt Damon
* Leonardo DiCaprio (too short?)
* Queen Latifah
You get the idea. Question is, why would any of these celebs put themselves through a meat grinder when they already have great careers? Has to be because they love the US and are willing to put themselves on the chopping block.
The belief that a President needs to be a leading actor in a movie, comes from living in a country in which the media covers everything like a reality show.
I can't tell if you are being serious or ironic, but if it's the former, please understand that we're in a crisis: It's sort of like how everybody was downloading music back in the era of Napster, before the move to the streaming model — and the industry was crashing. It's the same thing here with news/media: As the business model is changing, everybody is becoming a reality show host — until we pivot to the right financial model.
It could appear that Substack could be that model, but The Bulwark's alarmist tendencies suggests maybe not: Even if they are user-funded, a model in which they fully depend on subscriptions means they are incentivized to bump out content and to keep everyone on the hook with alarm.
When your ace closer walks the first four batters to let the tying run score in the bottom of the ninth, you have to pull him. That's what Biden did. I think he's the best president of my lifetime and would continue to be in a second term. But he is not up to the job of beating Trump. And if he cannot beat Trump, nothing else matters. That was the premise of his 2020 campaign. For the same reasons he stuck with it then, he needs to bow out now.
The only person who could beat Trump in a forum such as this is another reality tv performer. This is an act. His act is to show bullying strength, to hell with truth and diplomacy. His people don’t give a shit about that. Joe Biden is a person, not an actor. He presidents. That’s what he does. That’s what he should do. This “debate” was aimed for the trash heap of history from the getgo.
Some friends and I were discussing this and we came to the conclusion that going forward, presidential candidates need to be already famous as a performer of some sort. Like Zelensky. Like Reagan. Like Trump. You don't shoot a big-budget movie with unknown actors. You need star power.
Possibilities:
* Al Franken (but he shot his wad)
* John Stuart ( too lefty?)
* Steven Colbert
* Neil DeGrasse Tyson
* George Clooney
* Taylor Swift
* Steph Curry
* Dwayne Johnson
* Matt Damon
* Leonardo DiCaprio (too short?)
* Queen Latifah
You get the idea. Question is, why would any of these celebs put themselves through a meat grinder when they already have great careers? Has to be because they love the US and are willing to put themselves on the chopping block.
Thoughts?
The belief that a President needs to be a leading actor in a movie, comes from living in a country in which the media covers everything like a reality show.
I can't tell if you are being serious or ironic, but if it's the former, please understand that we're in a crisis: It's sort of like how everybody was downloading music back in the era of Napster, before the move to the streaming model — and the industry was crashing. It's the same thing here with news/media: As the business model is changing, everybody is becoming a reality show host — until we pivot to the right financial model.
It could appear that Substack could be that model, but The Bulwark's alarmist tendencies suggests maybe not: Even if they are user-funded, a model in which they fully depend on subscriptions means they are incentivized to bump out content and to keep everyone on the hook with alarm.