324 Comments
User's avatar
JAMES ROY LEE's avatar

I hope Italy bans ICE from stepping foot in their country. And then the US backs out of the Winter Olympics. And then the rest of the world boycotts the World Cup. Wouldn't that be lovely? It would demonstrate what the US has done to its reputation around the world.

Keith Wresch's avatar

The Italians should call them a terrorist organization and yes, ban them. On the World Cup front, none other than Sepp Blatter is calling for fans to boycott the event. When you’ve lost that fount of corruption you should know things are bad.

James Richardson's avatar

Too much corruption for Sepp Blatter. Hard to believe.

Keith Wresch's avatar

Hard to believe Sepp Blatter taking a principled stand on anything.

Keith Wresch's avatar

President of FIFA from 1998 - 2015 when his reign ended due to a massive corruption scandal which was no surprise as corruption at FIFA had become a lifestyle. He is still suspended from engaging in FIFA activities until 2027.

Robin's avatar

File this under "first world extremely petty problems" but it really pisses me off that for the first time in my life I will have the means and opportunity to attend an Olympics (LA28) and it looks like I will need to boycott it due to my own damn country.

Ellen Thomas's avatar

That's how my husband feels about the World Cup, but he is saying he won't even watch matches in the US on TV.

Danielle B72's avatar

At this point I will be surprised if there is not a massive boycott of the LA Olympics.

Cale Lively's avatar

Based on the price I’ve seen for World Cup tickets a general boycott might not be needed. They are running 1k a ticket for cheap seats. Add on cost of hotels and flights……

David Court's avatar

Only Felons need apply for tickets, or Friends of same.

Dave Yell's avatar

and billionaire and hi tech oligarchs

joeinMN's avatar

AS David C said, only felons ... billionaire, hi tech oligarchs are not an "or" group they are at least would-be felons. Certainly morally felonious.

Kate Fall's avatar

K-shaped economy strikes again.

Dave Yell's avatar

"Let them eat cake"

Douglas Peterson's avatar

No cake for me. It hurts to be on the downward line of the K.

(My cake money is going to the Bulwark subscription.)

Robert Jaffee's avatar

The dollar is at its lowest level since 1973 when we were experiencing stagflation; the Fed Funds rate was at 10.8% back the. Today, the Fed funds rate is 3.64%. Let that sink in, and it tells you that foreign investors are leaving the US market.

Therefore, for certain countries, the cost of a vacation here could be as much as 30-40% cheaper…and expect this to be just the beginning….:)

Kate Fall's avatar

If only they could come here without being kidnapped or having the Trump Admin rifle through their social media accounts.

Robert Jaffee's avatar

Exactly, so this could very well be a World Cup bust…:)

Cale Lively's avatar

It is only going to get worse. Most of export increases are in precious metals. Silver and gold primarily. Countries are moving to durable wealth in preparation for dumping the dollar.

Robert Jaffee's avatar

Agreed, I didn’t want to get ahead of my ski’s since you were only talking about the World Cup prices…:).

However, European and Asian central banks are decreasing their US dollar based assets.

Or in other words; they’re getting ready to dump the dollar as the reserve currency of the world! And don’t forget gold, silver and other metals like copper have crucial industrial uses. We’re about to get f*cked! These harebrained nitwits have no idea the longterm damage they are doing; or maybe thy do, and just don’t care!…:)

Nancy's avatar

Again, as I've posted, all of this needs to be in the press and explained to people like we're all in (as I've heard referenced) in kindergarten--because on this topic we seem to be!

Lori Kurtyka's avatar

This was my big fear and it’s coming true. We will be trapped in the US with worthless savings.

Nancy's avatar

Instead of talking about a booming economy because of the stock market, this information needs to be carried in headlines, i.e., that part about foreign investors leaving the US market. Trumpers would probably think we don't need them! However, the harm could be explained. Economists should be writing about this, or maybe they are and I'm missing it. If so, apologies to those good folks!

Robert Jaffee's avatar

There have been discussions in financial circles and it’s been reported in financial periodicals and the NYT’s. It just goes along unnoticed when we keep reaching new highs in the equity markets. However, equity markets are for the wildcats and gamblers; if you want to know the true breath of the markets, the smart money is in the bond markets, and they are the ones who ultimately control monetary policy; and central banks understand this point.

Bottom line, we’re seeing capital outflows or foreign investment by both international investors and foreign governments flea at a rate not seen since The Great Depression. And foreign governments are reducing their US dollar based investments, including government bonds in order to diversify their individual trade risks with the US.

These investments fuel our growth, and this is where the issue lies. We’re trading longterm investment in this nation for short-term gains, and this will leave most Americans in the red and unable to live even modestly.

Not to mention, when the West abandons the US dollar as the reserve currency of the world, we are in for a lot of pain; unless of course, your part of the 1-5%.

Nancy's avatar

Another comment. My newspaper (San Diego) today had a headline that said the job market was stabilizing. Then, on the first page of the Business section, there was a report on how many layoffs were occurring, i.e., at META, UPS, and Amazon--tens of thousands. I wrote a letter to the editor about this discrepancy. They probably won't print it.

Nancy's avatar

Thanks for a clear explanation of what's happening. I'm not a part of the 1-5%. I imagine most MAGAs aren't either. There are several lines in your explanation that would make good headlines in various places, including on MSM!

Patricia Lestz's avatar

I hope that Fifa because of member requests decides to hold the games in Canada and Mexico because of fear of harm and discrimination towards the players and guests. Also the Olympics while time should choose another venue than the US.

Steven Insertname's avatar

If I were an athlete from Brazil or Argentina (perennial World Cup favorites), I wouldn't come to the US.

Patricia Lestz's avatar

Exactly, That is why it needs to be moved. Keep the athletic and fans safe embarrass trump!

Patricia Lestz's avatar

What can we do as concerned citizens to convince Fifa and the olympics to move?

Dave's avatar

Isn't FIFA who gave Trump the pretend Peace Prize? Maybe I don't recall correctly but if true I'm not sure FIFA would entertain the idea of making Trump look bad no matter their member's concerns

Patricia Lestz's avatar

Fifa has a board and members some of whom were not happy with the “award”.

Dave Yell's avatar

If that were to happen, DJT would announce a hefty tariff on Italy.(to no one's surprise)

M. Trosino's avatar

Maybe, maybe not. The IOC could probably assuage his ire with a White House ceremony awarding him a handful of Olympic Gold Medals.

Mike Lew's avatar

Maybe they can award a gold medal for peace making! Much better than that lame Nobel Prize! 😀

Frau Katze's avatar

When is SCOTUS going to rule on these tariffs, which he’s using as weapons?

Kate Fall's avatar

Who are we rooting for in the Olympics? I mean, I'm rooting for American athletes but we might be banned. I need to get up to speed - the Olympics might be a good distraction from *gestures around*

JAMES ROY LEE's avatar

I no longer care which athletes win these events. But I am interested in how the crowds respond. There is going to be energetic booing every time the US national anthem gets played or US athletes get introduced. I hope NBC doesn't avoid covering this, but they will probably chicken out.

In the unlikely event that athletes won't get to compete, that will suck for them. It won't be fair after years of training and effort. But there is a bigger picture. It sucks more to get kidnapped off the street and sent to a concentration camp in Texas. It sucks more to be shot in the face. It sucks more to be murdered after trying to protect a woman from being assaulted. For a lot of Americans, life sucks right now.

Steven Insertname's avatar

If I was an American athlete going to Milan, I'd be wary of winning gold, bkz you'll get invited to the White House, and Trump would expect you to give it to him - and I'm only partially kidding. I'm sure Donald has heard the story of Putin stealing a Super Bowl ring (from the Patriots owner, IIRC), and wants to do the same thing. Plus, he wants *all* the gold, and thinks it rightfully belongs to him.

joeinMN's avatar

I feel for our athletes. I can only imagine the reception they will receive marching into the Olympic stadium. Hopefully none of them are injured by flying objects during their competitions.

Keith Wresch's avatar

The ‘28 Olympics are in LA they can’t ban us if we are hosting them — boycotting would be a whole other story.

Patricia Lestz's avatar

We should ask the olympic committee to move the games from LA

Kate Fall's avatar

I live in the Arctic (Western NY), I'm more of a Winter Olympics fan. 2028 might as well be on the Moon for all I know what will be happening.

Huffman: Doing Nothing's avatar

Remember when there is a kerfuffle about other countries' athletes refusing to compete against an American:

The single most important thing was getting trans- athletes out of sports.

Jane's avatar

I'd love to see these ICE agents taken into custody when they try to get through customs, frog marched to a detention facility, and then deported in shackles.

Nancy's avatar

I heard paid leave! Boo hoo!

Frau Katze's avatar

OK, thanks for the update.

rlritt's avatar

On leave. Thats great. They should be arrested, or at least fired.

Frau Katze's avatar

Agree. It’s a start, but only a start.

severn's avatar

this i would like. not to mention banning any relatives of anyone serving in the admin. put them in the worst seats too. make them pay for the toilets. um... no cappuccinos for breakfast.... im sure they can get creative.

Macfly163's avatar

James - don't forget to mention Epstein in your writings.

Christine Knowles's avatar

It will hit Americans where it will counts, sports! It will lay bare for anyone still with questions how much damage has been done. I expect to see scores of the MAGA (Make America Go Away) hats that people were wearing in Greenland.

Tung no's avatar

Just need to deny visa to them.

Kotzsu's avatar

Bulwarkers are pretty savvy, but for the record: a wedge issue is something that your squad agrees on and your opponents disagree on. You can't totally control what winds up wedging the opposition, but when you find it, you need to hammer it, to split the opposition's coalition. When your team is getting wedged, there's a lot of scrambling, basically survival is a matter of desperately trying to change the conversation. Think: trans sports bans for Dems in 2024.

If you're keeping score, the Democrats are spoiled with a richness of effective wedges. It's like they have multiple iron spikes driven into multiple cracks, and they could pick one or multiple, and shatter the GOP coalition.

Wedge #1 - ICE/DHS. It has become incredibly unpopular; the public is behind reigning them in (if not abolish/defund). So, hammer. Reps can't abandon the turf because it's Trump's whole schtick and his malignant narcissism won't let him admit defeat. But some Reps want to have a political future, so they will be forced to distance from Stephen Miller and Noem and Trump. So all the republicans will be forced to die on the hill, fighting EACH OTHER, if you fight them on it.

Wedge #2 - Healthcare. Dems are united, Reps are scrambling and have no ideas. Moderate Reps keep showing a willingness to throw in with Dems and split with Trump and the Freedom Caucus. The public is pissed, and it can easily tie into affordability.

Wedge #3 - Epstein. Again, passed almost unanimously out of the House and Senate and signed into law. Dems should be pressuring oversight. Trump et al. can't release the files, because ****we all know why**** and so all the Reps in Congress will be wedged from the admin, causing infighting.

Wedge #4 - Guns. Time to go full in on 2A. Trump cannot help himself and keeps complaining about lawful carry. Dems can still stand on their traditional ground, i.e. gun safety, common sense measures supported by 80% of people, but it isn't even a pivot for them to affirm the 2A, they do this reflexively ever since the 90s. Meanwhile, Reps in Congress have their hair on fire because Trump keeps doubling down on ICE/CBP being justified killing a protestor lawfully carrying a firearm.

Wedge #5 - Tariffs and Taxes. Dems are united, Republicans are split. Some republicans want more social programs, some want none. Some Republicans drink the kool aid or pretend to believe in the Trump tariff agenda. Dems just need to not hedge with "some tariffs are good," that's not the issue, just attack attack, attack, attack the Trump Tariffs in the form of the Trump tariffs. And point out these raise costs on goods and do the opposite of affordability. Point to coffee prices. Point to beef.

Richard Dorset's avatar

Great arguments! Well argued post! Regarding Wedge issue 1, the rats have pulled the knives out and are attacking each other with predictable disclaiming of responsibility and blaming of the other guy. The united front has splintered so it’s time to attack. Public sentiment is on the Dem’s side. Go for the jugular now

Melissa Dixon's avatar

Agreed, this was the best thing I've read in a while. We need to keep the pressure on getting rid of Stephen Miller, he gives me the total creeps. He is in trumps ear all of the time and frankly, he's an absolute nut and is one who is behind this disgusting elimination plan.

Nancy's avatar

His family agrees!

Anthony Lapadula's avatar

I love the high quality discussions that happen in Bulwark comments. This is the only user forum I've found that makes me feel smarter instead of stupider and angrier.

Hey Mama Warrior's avatar

ALL of 👆!!! Before Voldemort came to power - I was basically politically ignorant. I cared about people, particularly the marginalized. I am a special needs mom after all, but this whole 💩 show, it’s made me pursue political, and civics information.

I’m in MN now and the abuse and violation of BASiC liberties, and rights, just can’t be understood. The trauma to citizens, and particularly the marginalized, and our youth, d@mn, that’s gonna take generations to heal. We’ll need STRONG constitutional advocates, and reps who care about social issues. The mental health services of this country were strained before, but now, 🤦‍♀️.

So grateful for ALL who work at The Bulwark, and who are part of this community.

Keith Wresch's avatar

To point #1: when those in the administration are trying to distance themselves from each other on the topic you should know that’s a winner.

J AZ's avatar

Kotzsu - great observations & steps forward.

May I amplify this way: when we hammer on a crack, try talking within the frame of your target audience. E.g. ICE is becoming radioactive, but yelling "abolish ICE" to middle America enables opposition rhetoric to counter that ICE is necessary to prevent caravans of rapists & drug dealers from invading YOUR neighborhood!! 😬 Don't provide the opening to have the topic flipped back to the Trumpist strong suit.

Talk with neighbors about how BP/ICE/DHS are masked and militarized, not like our local police who are our neighbors who we see at grocery, school drop off, church. Obama deported more people than Trump and there were never videos like we see daily - people being disrespected, hit, gassed by ICE. Point out how the BP agents behave belligerent & trigger happy - this leads to bad things happening when tensions are high. Focus on the ways the anonymous gunners endanger community peace & safety, how they're wasting time & money on people going about their evereyday lives instead of catching actual criminals who have convictions/warrants for arrest. When people feel the impact on themselves, you have more of their attention. That's how Trump uses fear to get attention. We can try to keep focus on feelings too - of inconvenience, unfairness, morals.

Dave the wave's avatar

Agree completely. Unfortunately, there is no Pelosi around to keep the "abolish and defund" crowd from spouting off. One comment by AOC and the like, replayed on a never-ending loop, will flip the issue against the Dems.

J AZ's avatar

I grit my teeth and keep strokin

D.J. Spiny Lumpsucker's avatar

If you don't have the moral spine to call for the end of the Gestapo, we need you out of our movement.

If you can't understand the difference between the police and DHS, and how voters perceive that difference, you're too clueless to recommend policy. (But you J seem to get it.)

If you don't have the coms skill to message the end of the Gestapo effectively now, we need you to shut the fuck up.

Cale Lively's avatar

This requires Democrats as and organization to be competent and aggressive. Two things they have proven time and time again to not be. Democrats while unified behind these issues are not unified in action or strategy. It is why they lose all the time in races they should win. Look at the unaligned movement last election, anyone with any common sense could see that stance was stupid. Yet…..they went on about. On the inverse any competent person could also see they were going to be stubborn and the Kamala should have offered a fig leaf of some kind and she really didn’t. Know neither yourself nor your enemy and all that.

Ellen Thomas's avatar

I get frustrated too, but I think we should save our spleen for Republicans, who really got us into this mess, and are keeping us from extracting ourselves. Yes, Democrats need to unify, and we should push them to do better, but let's be honest about whose fault this really is.

Dave Yell's avatar

Mark Kelly and Josh Shapiro are making themselves a lot more public lately. A very good sign for Democrats.

Cale Lively's avatar

Players win games and teams win championships. Democrats have some good players but as a team they are awful. Look at the Bills, that’s what happens in poorly run organizations.

Cale Lively's avatar

Putting your faith in Chamberlain to protect Czechoslovakia. I am sorry but Democrats and their inability to wield power and act effectively bare blame here and I have lost almost all faith that they will save us. Say Democrats win in 2026 and 2028 do you believe that they will take the steps necessary to fix and stop the damage? They haven’t so far. They helped contribute to the factors that have lead to Trump and empowered him. Finally the Republicans are going to Republican, being mad or having ire for them won’t change that.

Steven Insertname's avatar

Kamala had a very good chance to win in '24, but the party came in and took over the campaign, completely neutering the momentum she had coming out of the convention.

Cale Lively's avatar

Very true and the mishandled Waltz strength as the attack dog. They ran that campaign as if they were up by three scores in the 4th quarter when in reality they were up one and all Trump needed was a field goal. This isn’t just a national thing. I signed up to be a PCO in an open spot in November and my local party can’t respond to my follow up. My state party can’t respond to my follow up. Thankfully they can’t stop me from running in May, but I’ll be one small voice in a large incompetent pond. From the local level to the national level the Democrats can’t get their poop in a group. They’ve driven out labor, hollowing their toughness and grit. As an organization they are a joke. We have been forced to use this clumsy tool called the Democratic Party and the sooner we can replace it the better. Maybe we need a Bulwark party.

Ellen Thomas's avatar

This really helps me understand your frustration. I don't know what state you are in, but thank you for trying to be involved. It sounds unbelievably frustrating, and that is definitely not what is needed right now.

Cherie Rhoad's avatar

Nutless Schumer learned NOTHIG from Mitch McConnell

TomD's avatar

When has Schumer done anything remotely like allowing an obviously guilty impeached POTUS to walk?

Steven Insertname's avatar

McConell used the power of his position MUCH more effectively to stonewall the opposition than Schumer has.

TomD's avatar

Maybe. I'd like to see a side-by-side comparison by someone who would know.

Steven Insertname's avatar

A big factor I see is that McConnell was able to block a SCotUS nominee for nine months, then confirmed ACB in like five minutes, while Schumer's senate was unable to slow down Trump's cabinet noms and hasn't even been a speedbump in getting everything Trump wanted thru (yes, from a minority position).

DJ's avatar

Largely agree except on guns. Trump has shot his mouth off on this before, then walked it back. Voters who care about 2A issues know this.

Keith Wresch's avatar

I don’t think it would hurt to start muddying the waters on the topic. Trump demonstrated that on abortion where people don’t believe he is committed to the anti-abortion cause. If Democrats came out in support of gun rights while still supporting restrictions most people agree on, that could blunt the rhetoric of them wanting to take away guns.

Steven Insertname's avatar

Dems shouldn't let what Trump does going forward stop them from replaying the "You can't have guns" video on constant repeat for the next 10 months.

Kotzsu's avatar

Getting the NRA to criticize Trump, even in an extremely mild way, to me seemed a bit different from before, but might be I am wrong. To me that seems like they're wedged. I'd much rather the NRA waste time and money and resources trying to fix the White House's messaging on guns then deploying their resources against Democrats.

Dave the wave's avatar

May be just a reminder to Trump as to who gave him $30M to get elected. The Dems will never be able to convince anyone that that they are better on guns. In my opinion, a waste of time to try.

J AZ's avatar

Dave - I agree no Dem likely to convince a 2A voter that Dems are better. I believe some might become less confident that Republicans are looking out for them either, which lowers motivation to vote for either. Any reduction in Republican votes would seem a positive to me.

Some indications of this among anti abortion voters once Trump abandoned issue “to the states.” Feel like he used them and doesn’t really care about all those babies after all.

D.J. Spiny Lumpsucker's avatar

"Better"??? "Anyone"???

Damn, y'all are clueless. Yeah, it's not just that the gun nuts aren't going to abandon Trump, but even hinting 'we're the real 2A party' would eviscerate the Dem base, and uh, you know, fuel the fires of senseless gun deaths.

Dave Yell's avatar

DJT always shoots his mouth off. He can't help it.

Robert Jaffee's avatar

Well said, but from I understand social media is blocking content on ICE and Epstein, so we have other issues to deal with as well since this is where most people get their news.

Not to mention, Ellison just closed on TikTok which should be interesting as well. Expect misinformation and disinformation campaigns the likes of which we’ve never seen before!….:)

Steven Insertname's avatar

My commenting ability on Instagram got cut off yesterday (which IIRC was the day they started the censorship on Epstein, etc). I deleted my account shortly thereafter.

Robert Jaffee's avatar

Good for you, I left Facebook in 2016, and haven’t joined anything but BlueSky since….:)

Steven Insertname's avatar

I shitcanned my FB acct around then, too. IG was the last social media presence I had, unless you count YouTube, where I mostly watch Crooked Media (Pod Save... and Alex Wagner) stuff and Kimmel and Colbert monologues (and Jelle's Marble Runs, lol).

Dave the wave's avatar

Agree with the concept. Choice of wedge is everything. Goal should only be to flip House and Senate in 2026, that's it. Issues must appeal to persuadables, namely the 51% that self-identify as Independents. If you have to explain too much, you will lose. Also be humble and recognize that there are a lot of people who will not respond favorably to being "educated". Avoid issues that are subject to reasonable whataboutism.

#'s 1 and 5 are difficult. #1 is a tough issue. The reason it is so powerful, currently, is it's all on video and the victims are white and were born here. People can relate to them. Unless messaged perfectly (impossible for Schumer and Jeffries) it will devolve into whatabout catching the pedos and rapists. They should take the win now (Bovino fired, Trump backed down, etc.) and tell the public what happened can't happen again and the Dem's will make sure no one will be murdered for helping someone up. #5 is too complex. It is one of those issues that most people will conclude they don't know and will never know enough to understand. They would be right.

#4 shouldn't be wedged. Trumps comments should be a scab that is picked at, constantly, but no one will ever be convinced that Dems will be better for them on guns. Further complicating matters is the fact that there are many people who are gun owners that are Independents and Dems. It's an issue that is personal to them. That makes it dangerous.

It's #2 and #3. #2 fits neatly into the affordability issue which we know cuts across every political and economic group (other than the Billionaires). It can also be easily rolled into a little economic class warfare. I don't agree with Bernie on much, but he knows the power of that issue, he communicates it clearly and focuses on it relentlessly.

Finally, #3. Who can argue against seeing every last page of those files? If you do are you pro pedo? Are you for protecting a bunch of rich, powerfully people who are trying to escape responsibility for the most heinous of acts? Rogan is on our side! It's an issue to which there is no response. This should be hammered on daily. The redacted documents should be shown daily. (SNL figured it out, why couldn't Chuck and Hakeem?) Bondi and Blache are two of the least likable people alive. Make it about them and their boss. If Clinton has to be made uncomfortable, so be it.

Huffman: Doing Nothing's avatar

Guns is the single best wedge issue in this list.

"Trump says you can't have guns" should be the basis of a multi-year ad campaign that hits literally everywhere in the country.

D.J. Spiny Lumpsucker's avatar

Congratulations!!!

You win the award for the worst comment ever on the Bulwark!!

😋💩😋💩😋💩

Linda Oliver's avatar

As to Wedge No. 3, Epstein and pedophilia were just used as a subject to get a small subset of Republicans exercised enough about to vote their way. Now that they’re in power, they’re free to jettison it as readily as they jettisoned the abortion issue. We got your vote, thank you very much, ‘bye!

Marcia Formica's avatar

Truly excellent assessment!! Who here has good access to Dem leadership to share this??

Robert Jaffee's avatar

“OUT TO LUNCH: Donald Trump has always spent lots of time hanging out in these fantasy lands of his own creation. Recently, though, there’s been reason to wonder whether he ever leaves them at all. As the White House has reeled from the death of Alex Pretti and its own insane first-take response of smearing him as a “domestic terrorist,” one figure has been all but absent from the conversation: Trump himself.”

Out to lunch would be an understatement! Perhaps we should be investigating Trump for using an autopen because when asked about anything, he apparently never has a clue.

When asked why did he pardon the former president of Honduras, he replied, “I don’t know much about the guy, they said he was unfairly punished. When asked about Project 2025 he said, “I never read it, and don’t know much about it.”

Clearly, if Biden deserves to be Incarcerated for being “out to lunch” and using an autopen, why does Trump get a pass? Just asking for a friend!…:)

JF's avatar

The “double standard” is the strongest hidden article in our Constitution.

David Court's avatar

Not in MY Constitution. Don't know about yours. I think you mean the one that the Felon keeps under his pillow, loaning it to John Roberts when he is told it is necessary.

JF's avatar

David, did you forget to add your daily dose of Sarcasm Alert to your coffee? Or are you trying to cut back?

David Court's avatar

On the Alerts, not the Sarcasm. 😏

Dave Yell's avatar

Drink some Jolt. Up the energy of sarcasm!

Justin Lee's avatar

Biden used an autopen but likely knew what was being signed. Trump signs documents himself but likely pays little attention to what he's signing.

CLR's avatar

That's because he can't read. I'd love for a reporter to ask him about what book he has read most recently.

Steven Insertname's avatar

Mein Kampf. It's the only book he knows about. Or the Bible. Maybe.

M. Trosino's avatar

The Bible? Well, I expect he's read the bottom line on sales of his "Trump Bible", anyway...

https://apnews.com/article/trump-god-bless-usa-bible-greenwood-2713fda3efdfa297d0f024efb1ca3003

As to Mein Kampf... not likely. But only because I don't think it comes in a picture book edition. Wait...

Well, hell...

https://dynasty-auctions.com/en/items/adolf-hitler-mein-kampf-first-illustrated-edition-in-18-booklets-london-1939/

Steven Insertname's avatar

During the 2016 campaign there was reporting that Ivanka said that Donald kept a copy on his nightstand. There's some dispute about the details, tho.

https://forward.com/schmooze/318664/trump-and-hitler/

CLR's avatar

And Ivanka would know because.....?

V J's avatar

former skier, married to idiot, IVANA

new amer. daughter has the K

Ivana was once almost a little normal ( for a foreigner )

Katherine B Barz's avatar

Maybe he signs a blank page and the writing comes later. The speed those EO’s appeared tells me they were mass produced, and waiting for an opportune time. Felon Trump was asked about a specific EO last year, and said he knew nothing about it. Auto Pen from Miller? Or signed blank ready and available for use.

Michele Pfannenstiel DVM's avatar

All ICE agents should be detained at the Milan airport

And while we are at it... FFS, boycott the World Cup. Can you imagine if people just had not shown up to the '36 Olympics?

And my jaw is on the floor that we pay so much for pharmaceuticals that companies would rather pull out of Europe then drop prices here.

Janet Wilson's avatar

Call their bluff. Then the same price will be applied everywhere.

V J's avatar
Jan 29Edited

the man has a lot of experience with threats and extortions, a few bribes

as your money is everything to this useless dud of a president

I'm almost done reading about this turd

he will take us all down, Mary Trump

said, long ago

IF HE feels insulted, slighted he will take us all down with him, over any slight

( lost an election, never could win MN )

Don Gates's avatar

'“This is a militia that kills, a militia that enters into the homes of people, signing their own permission slips,” Milan Mayor Giuseppe Sala told a local radio station this week. “It is clear they are not welcome in Milan, without a doubt.”'

About the best summation of what ICE is that you'll see from anyone, anywhere. The world is watching Minneapolis; they endured Trump's handling of Greenland. They've taken our measure, and we're as highly regarded as Putin and Russia now. Quite a fall from grace in a mere 12 months.

James Richardson's avatar

Hopefully Italy will refuse to admit ICE personnel. Trump's reaction might kick up an international incident that might be helpful.

Ashley's avatar

Democrats MUST hold the line on this. Period. The end.

We are all watching, and if they allow funding to move forward for the brown shirts of our generation, then they are complicit.

I know, I know, it sucks that they always have to be the responsible ones, but in this case it is a no brainer.

We will not hesitate to primary and vote out any Democrat who does not fight like hell so that we CAN have a country still (a little twist on Trump’s own words).

JF's avatar

It might hurt the economy, but not as much as the economic strike that is being planned if this situation continues.

Ashley's avatar

And they should think about that, too. Because we are not accepting this.

Steven Insertname's avatar

The only way to get Trump's attention is to hurt him in the wallet, and the only way to do that is to get the money oligarch's attention, and the only way to do that is boycotts and strikes.

And, tangentially, it neuters The Bulwark's message when there are links to Amazon and ads for United Health Care on the site.

JF's avatar

The wallet is the only way to influence ANY Republican, and it has been true for half a century. I haven’t seen the ads, but I use the Substack app only. That is a bit disturbing.

Steven Insertname's avatar

I only use the Substack website, and every link to a guest author's book, and that sort of thing is always a link to the Amazon page. And there was a UHC ad on a Triad piece the other day.

Gross.

I've asked in a number of ways that they stop taking ad money from fascist sympathizers (DMs, emails, comments), but it keeps slowly getting worse.

I said this in another comment elsewhere, but it's not YET enough to stop supporting them, and I'd be much happier if they'd get the fascist ads (all ads, really) out of my face as a paying cohort.

JF's avatar

Do you have a reason for not using the Substack app? To me, it seems like one of the most functional platforms out there. Sorry; I don’t mean to pry.

Steven Insertname's avatar

I just tend to not use my phone for much in general. I have the app installed, and use it occasionally, but I don't like reading on a phone, and don't like wearing headphones, in public spaces, like on the bus or at the grocery store.

I also just don't trust apps in general. If they're NOT scraping your data, they could be, despite whatever permissions you give them - distrust that also extends to Apple and Android OS makers. Google and Apple are not deserving of much trust from me.

I use Opera web browser at home, and have security tweaked 12 ways from Sunday, so I block a lot of ads and don't volunteer much data.

I'm GenX and have a healthy distrust of corporations and tech.

Bart's avatar

Democrats should demand that ICE and border patrol should only be deployed to a state or municipality if they are requested by the local government OR if there is a finding by a federal judge in the district that a significant and disproportionate amount of undocumented immigration activity exists in that region with the standard being that there is no other region that better fits the objective criteria. This would eliminate much of the potential for abuse with targeting Democratic controlled states and cities and point out the hypocrisy and stupidity of ICE and border patrol operating in Minnesota instead of Texas.

Kotzsu's avatar

I do think we need to start seriously considering that Trump and Miller see CBP and ICE as their SS or brownshirts, and they need to be significantly dismantled.

Even if Dem's focus group this to hell and decide "abolish" is the wrong messaging framework, these agencies need to go back to 1/20th the number of staff, and put them back in windbreakers, khakis, and shirt sleeves. No more little-green-men secret-police keystone cop toy soldiers. I don't care what anodyne bullshit phraseology they come up with, whether it's Freeze ICE or Melt ICE or Reform ICE or whatever.

Janet Wilson's avatar

And...they don't need weaponry.

Bart's avatar

Also, local governments have taken the position that they will not cooperate with ICE. This should be reversed and cooperation with local police departments demanded. Disarm ICE and local law enforcement provides the security for ICE....billed to DHS.

max skinner's avatar

What does cooperation mean in this context? Does it mean calling up ICE whenever city police pick up someone who has an accent? Does it mean contacting ICE when a drunk driver who is undocumented is released from the drunk tank? Does it mean housing an undocumented person for however long it takes until ICE gets through the deportation process after that person has served the criminal sentence that landed them in jail? What's the cost to the local department for doing these things?

Bart's avatar

Costs to local departments should be billed to DHS including but not limited to providing mandatory security to ICE agents who want to conduct operations in the jx and dealing with protestors since ICE has demonstrated that they can't do it.

Your examples are what has traditionally been thought of the imposition of requirements on local police departments by DHS, it should be reversed and the local police departments demand that DHS coordinate with them before conducting operations.

I don't see any reason that a local police department should detain someone purely on the grounds of their immigration status. In certain cases (DUI, domestic violence, etc), they may want to, but for the most part no.

max skinner's avatar

What security is needed for ICE to do their jobs? I fear we've been warped by current events into thinking that ICE has to run down folks ala a cop show or movie smashing car windows, busting down doors, facing armed people who will resist . In the olden days ICE went to fields and meatpacking plants and rounded up the workers...ignoring those who hired those workers. Maybe security is needed then, but why shouldn't ICE provide its own security for doing that sort of operation?

D.J. Spiny Lumpsucker's avatar

Phraseology? The internet has pictures, you know. If you say "abolish" you've got hundreds of pictures of DHS stuff that needs to be abolished. If you say "reform" you sound like a pathetic concede in advance wimp if you put that with any of the good pictures.

Merrill's avatar

Ironically, the great weapon used so often by arch conservatives to defeat the liberal agenda is now the best weapon to use against Trump's fascist war on America. States Rights! This is the real push back!

The 2nd Amendment gives to each State the right to keep an armed militia to protect people's freedom and security in its State.

Today the State's "armed militia" is the National Guard. The undisputed threat to freedom in the States is Trump and his private army; ICE and CBP.

We should not expect private protestors to stand up to fully armed, undisciplined agents of the Federal government.

M. Trosino's avatar

RE: "the hypocrisy and stupidity of ICE and border patrol operating in Minnesota instead of Texas."

Well, it wasn't in Texas, but there was a CBP shooting yesterday in Arizona, which is close enough to make a point...

https://apnews.com/article/arizona-border-patrol-shooting-arivaca-5d097088d4851c86a2dcd3ba58250f2d

This one hasn't gotten much press because it appears to be completely justified. And it's actually an example of the "worst of the worst" CBP and ICE are supposed to be tasked with apprehending, even if this particular criminal is a *U.S. citizen* who's been involved in human smuggling and other crimes along the border rather than being an illegal migrant weed whacking grass for a lawn service company in the wilds of a suburban neighborhood.

And it's illustrative of the difference between CBP professionals working under the auspices and direction of professional supervisory personnel, following long-established legal and ethical protocols in an appropriate area where their agency is specifically trained and mandated to work, and the cowboys loosed on the streets of a city in the interior of our country, obviously untrained to deal with crowd control in urban settings and with a mandate from their until-a-hot-minute-ago local trench-coated handler to intimidate rather than to interact and communicate with American citizens, legal residents and the people who are the objects of their deployment there rationally, calmly and with professionalism. And apparently to not only shoot first but to not even worry about asking questions later, since the feds have got their backs if they execute a citizen by shooting them in the back ten times. But I digress.

The point in this specific case is this: professionalism and cooperation in the matter of the investigation of the use of (potentially) deadly force on the part of all.

The sheriff - a Democrat! - is noted as having previously said his agency will not enforce federal immigration law amid President Donald Trump’s crackdown and that he will "use his limited resources to focus on local crime and other public safety issues."

And yet...AND YET...

> The Pima County Sheriff’s Department said *the FBI asked IT to lead a use-of-force investigation of the Border Patrol.* *It noted that such investigations are standard when a federal agency is involved in a shooting in the county*. < (emphasis mine)

What?!

Is Kash Patel too busy these days to launch another self-conflicted investigation into a federal agency's use of (deadly) force. Is Kristi Noem off taking target practice on stray dogs in a gravel pit somewhere and unavailable to do so either?

*Local law enforcement* leading an investigation into a use of force incident involving a shooting by a federal agent? Why, that's... that's...

The way it ought to be?

Which is probably the way at least some things are (or at the very least try to be) the farther away from the limelight of the immigration freak show Trump's staging in our cities with agents who ought to be working for the most part on our borders or in specific border-adjacent areas.

> The sheriff’s department said its involvement in the investigation was the result of “long standing relationships” built over time in the border area to promote transparency. <

But on the streets of cities in blue states, the one and only thing that's transparent is the government's insistence that its racism and fascism are patriotism.

David Court's avatar

"Democrats can now force such a debate."

That they "can" is basic. That they "should" and "must" is the issue. Schumer has drawn his line in the sand again ... again. --- and again. Give him and the others enough backbone to carry through and try to convince the few Republicans who have said they would not vote for more ICE funding to hold the line even if it means stopping everything again.

Sure, another shut-down will hurt the public, but the public will be hurt more now and in the future by another show of D "Oh gee, we are in the minority, we have no power" BS because they will never have more public support than they do now.

Dave Yell's avatar

Hang the anchor ICE around the necks of Republicans for the Midterms. After that do the same to Vance in28.

Alondra's avatar

Yes! The iron is hot and the pot's at the boil. Friday is a day of propitious convergence. Simple morality demands it. Let those who choose T over basic and American morality defend their choice while we act on ours. Not complicated: now is the time to rein in self-signed permission slips, masked state agents of terror and the man who put it all in motion.

Maryann Boyd's avatar

Rather than funding ICE or border patrol, perhaps that money would be better spent going to the city of Minneapolis to pay for the trash the agents left behind in the streets (tear gas canisters etc), paying for the car windows they busted out, the emotional suffering of the people of Minneapolis and the free towing at the city 's expense of the cars left behind when they rip people out of them. If I wrote everything I am feeling right now my comment would be longer than your article Bill, so I will stop here. Thank you!

Salted Grits's avatar

"She probably had herself sprayed, knowing her," says Miracle Ear.

Michele Pfannenstiel DVM's avatar

Every accusation is a confession

Maribeth's avatar

“Miracle Ear” I love that! 💜😂💜🤣

V J's avatar

fragmentation of a ___ little tiny, tiny piece of plastic, some blood

whatever

Kate Fall's avatar

"She probably had herself sprayed, knowing her,” Trump told ABC’s Rachel Scott.

Trump has lost the ability to know how his words will land. This phrase hit the internet like a bomb, with millions of people crying out, "This proves he faked his assassination attempt! Projection!"

I'm working up a new Universal Theory of American Enshittification that begins and ends with "These people are just the laziest people who have ever been in charge and everything they do is about avoiding work." As far as I can tell, the government doesn't work and is completely focused on making social media content. I guess I'll wait until my parents tell me their Social Security didn't show up, as that's the only thing that will shake their community out of their celebratory stupor.

Geoff Anderson's avatar

Love the new theory of Enshittification!

Lewis Grotelueschen's avatar

"although how much that will actually lower costs remains to be seen"

Trump said he lowered drug prices by 1400%, which explains why I get a wad of cash every morning when I swallow a handful of pills. Now I understand why the cash is in Euros. Thank you Emmanuel.

Keith Wresch's avatar

Given the current exchange rate, I would rather be paid in euros than dollars.

M. Trosino's avatar

RE: Rep. Ilhan Omar

From what I've known of her, she's too far left for a good portion of her politics to align comfortably with mine. However, I don't live in her district, and she doesn't represent me. But I'll tell you what... I've got a whole new respect for the lady...

And after last night, I'd take her all day, any day and twice on Sunday compared to a lot of Dems and any lily-livered, spineless milquetoast Republican you can name, just on the strength of the character she displayed after being physically assaulted during her town hall meeting.

Here's what happened after she made a statement that ICE is too broken to fix and should be shut down, and that Kristi Noem should either resign or be impeached, both ideas with plenty of merit in my book, whatever else I may disagree with her about.

Pay attention to her reaction, since actions speak louder than words...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHyMtQfycKM

Did Omar look afraid? Was she intimidated? Hell no, she went for the guy, and it appears she would've probably cold-cocked the son of a bitch had one of her security people not tackled him to the ground first.

When asked by some of her supporters to cancel the rest of the meeting out of concern for her safety, she refused, saying adamantly that she would take anything that was thrown at her and that she wouldn't be intimidated by anyone.

After the meeting, when the press descended on her as she was leaving, in a bit more restrained and almost subdued manner (I expect the adrenalin had run its course by then), she said she was "fine" when asked by someone if she were OK. She then perked back up and stated again her refusal to be intimidated, saying, "I'll be here. Because that's the way I'm built."

I'll be here. Because that's the way I'm built.

We should all be so eloquent in expressing resolve to resist the fascism and reprehensible tactics and policy of the feds who wish to be our overlords.

If ever there were words to represent what Minneapolis and all the rest of America now need to be telling Donald Trump and his goons loudly, clearly and with the pride and resolve of genuine patriotism about his immigration agenda and tactics if he persists with the inhumanity and violence, it would be these:

We'll be here. In the streets. In your face. Because that's the way we're built.

James Richardson's avatar

The main difference between Trump and Omar isn't origin, sex or skin color. It's toughness.

(And he got more money from his daddy.)

orbit's avatar

She didn't hesitate a second and went right after that guy.

She cocked her right arm as she neared him.

She was ready to go, that's for sure.

M. Trosino's avatar

If I ever need a security detail and she's available, I could probably do a lot worse. :-)

V J's avatar

she's been tough for a long time

M. Trosino's avatar

Man, I was a more than a little shocked when I saw her take off after that guy. And her resolute and defiant "I'll be here. Because that's the way I'm built" afterward... Feisty little thing, isn't she?

I've seen big-ass men shrink like wilting violets in the face of much less serious provocation than that.

Bryan Fichter's avatar

I feel a little sorry for U.S. Olympians, who have worked incredibly hard for years for their opportunity and are going to be representing a pariah nation in Italy.

Steven Insertname's avatar

I know I'm rooting for the Canadian hockey and curling teams, and Americans rarely medal in other winter sports (I don't bother with stuff like figure skating, so maybe that team has a shot).

Claudia Allred's avatar

FINALLY! I understood and adored “Cheap Shots” this morning! Amen, Senior Sisters of the Lutheran persuasion! Drive on, you Subarus!

Carolyn Phipps's avatar

Senior Lutheran Lady here. Aux barricades, mes soeurs!!

Richard Dorset's avatar

This is a well constructed and argued strategy for Senate Dems to follow. There can be no backsliding on this. The country is understandably revulsed by the events in Minneapolis. Now is the time for Senate Dems to plant their flag and stand as firmly as Alex Pretti did in defending the woman who was being pepper sprayed by the ICE barbarians, except for the clueless John Fetterman, that is. The Senate Dems need to frame the argument such that if Republicans balk at stripping out the additional funds for ICE and CBP, they are choosing to shut down the government