IIRC every lawyer I heard on a podcast (limited sample, I know) was skeptical that the most serious charge (seditious conspiracy) would stick, because 1. there's limited precedent that would clarify what it means, or what the threshold is; 2, because conspiracies are inherently hard to prove. Yet here we are. An indictment of Roger Stone…
IIRC every lawyer I heard on a podcast (limited sample, I know) was skeptical that the most serious charge (seditious conspiracy) would stick, because 1. there's limited precedent that would clarify what it means, or what the threshold is; 2, because conspiracies are inherently hard to prove. Yet here we are. An indictment of Roger Stone now makes sense.
IIRC every lawyer I heard on a podcast (limited sample, I know) was skeptical that the most serious charge (seditious conspiracy) would stick, because 1. there's limited precedent that would clarify what it means, or what the threshold is; 2, because conspiracies are inherently hard to prove. Yet here we are. An indictment of Roger Stone now makes sense.
Btw, this is quite a heartbreaking article: Rhodes was a damaged person (possibly bipolar), but very damaging as well: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63709446