Because a reasonable person might not think "rape as a weapon of war" was something that needed specific condemnation when their policy on it generally is already quite unequivocal? UN Women is not known for making exceptions on this sort of thing. That's my point; does a failure to make a specific condemnation negate a broad one that covers the circumstance? Because if it does, that's an awful lot of people who are tacitly pro-arltrocity in here, and we're among them.
Because a reasonable person might not think "rape as a weapon of war" was something that needed specific condemnation when their policy on it generally is already quite unequivocal? UN Women is not known for making exceptions on this sort of thing. That's my point; does a failure to make a specific condemnation negate a broad one that covers the circumstance? Because if it does, that's an awful lot of people who are tacitly pro-arltrocity in here, and we're among them.