I get Netflix’s strategy, but that being said, why only one week instead of 3? I would’ve kept it in theaters all that way until 12/16. Let people go out and see it and create buzz.
I’m sure there are some people that will sign up over Christmas to watch it, but I’m guessing that a lot of the people that will make up the Glass Onion’s mil…
I get Netflix’s strategy, but that being said, why only one week instead of 3? I would’ve kept it in theaters all that way until 12/16. Let people go out and see it and create buzz.
I’m sure there are some people that will sign up over Christmas to watch it, but I’m guessing that a lot of the people that will make up the Glass Onion’s millions of minutes viewed are already subscribers.
Why not get them to pay for the movie ticket (which I did) and then watch it again via their subscription (which I pay)?
Anyway, that episode on Disney Parks was fascinating. As mention in the discussion, it make it seem like the warning signs at the park might have been what doomed Chapek more than anything.
100% and I get that being the case for them. I would just further make the case that it’s not so much about the $18 million as much as what it can get you. You could get the word of mouth buzz, a better relationship with theaters (granted, not high on the list for them), and a good relationship with creatives (much higher on the list for them)
I get Netflix’s strategy, but that being said, why only one week instead of 3? I would’ve kept it in theaters all that way until 12/16. Let people go out and see it and create buzz.
I’m sure there are some people that will sign up over Christmas to watch it, but I’m guessing that a lot of the people that will make up the Glass Onion’s millions of minutes viewed are already subscribers.
Why not get them to pay for the movie ticket (which I did) and then watch it again via their subscription (which I pay)?
Anyway, that episode on Disney Parks was fascinating. As mention in the discussion, it make it seem like the warning signs at the park might have been what doomed Chapek more than anything.
The difference between $12 and $30M is a rounding error, though.
100% and I get that being the case for them. I would just further make the case that it’s not so much about the $18 million as much as what it can get you. You could get the word of mouth buzz, a better relationship with theaters (granted, not high on the list for them), and a good relationship with creatives (much higher on the list for them)