"Appeasement" is much too generous for Carlson. He is unabashedly rooting for the authoritarian powers.
Sad to say, but "appeasement" applies to the largest share of leaders & pundits in the U.S., including the Biden administration. It is considered wise policy to equip Ukraine only to the point where a stalemate occurs and a partition is…
"Appeasement" is much too generous for Carlson. He is unabashedly rooting for the authoritarian powers.
Sad to say, but "appeasement" applies to the largest share of leaders & pundits in the U.S., including the Biden administration. It is considered wise policy to equip Ukraine only to the point where a stalemate occurs and a partition is negotiated. I believe opinion is divided into three camps:
25% - Anti Ukraine, let Putin win
50% - Appeasement
25% - Support Ukraine to force Russian withdrawal
I perceive the percentages as similar in Europe, although Ukraine support is somewhat stronger due to their proximity.
"Appeasement" is much too generous for Carlson. He is unabashedly rooting for the authoritarian powers.
Sad to say, but "appeasement" applies to the largest share of leaders & pundits in the U.S., including the Biden administration. It is considered wise policy to equip Ukraine only to the point where a stalemate occurs and a partition is negotiated. I believe opinion is divided into three camps:
25% - Anti Ukraine, let Putin win
50% - Appeasement
25% - Support Ukraine to force Russian withdrawal
I perceive the percentages as similar in Europe, although Ukraine support is somewhat stronger due to their proximity.