I don't think the cult of anti-Trump has the brainpower to note that their continued crusade against him with breathtaking abuses of power are sending more voters to his corner.
I don't think the cult of anti-Trump has the brainpower to note that their continued crusade against him with breathtaking abuses of power are sending more voters to his corner.
They focused on the swing states. And they harvested ballots to win as much as they could. And in the end, even with DJT derangement syndrome fed to the public for four years prior, the Democrats could barely muster most slim majority ever in the history of our Great Experiment.
The good news it is only 2 years of hell. 2022 will start the Great Repair.
To increase voter participation, various organizations in multiple states have made active and coordinated efforts to collect absentee voters' ballots during elections. Then they drop them off at polling places or election offices.
This practice, known as ballot harvesting, has been effective and, unsurprisingly, has generated controversy.
Some see the practice of ballot harvesting as a voter service that has long-assisted elderly voters and Native American voters living on remote reservations. Others see it is a political tool that can easily lend itself to fraud.
So Trump's own Attorney General testifies to Trump's claims of voter fraud being "all bullshit." I could refer you to a library shelf of books of other things Never-Trumpers "have." But we all know nothing will penetrate.
And I have an Ivy League PhD. So what? I've seen enough of your comments to understand that you have no interest in good faith discussion. You let on how well read you are. But all we get from you are hackneyed concepts like Trump Derangement Syndrome.
That explains quite a bit. I know many, many people with prestigious academic awards, and very few of them do I consider strong critical thinkers. Most of them are myopic in their thought patterns and miss the big picture. That makes sense since they had delayed their launch into the real world to focus on generally one academic discipline. They end up working for me. I hire and fire PhDs from Ivy League schools more often than you probably do any work with your hands.
So I just sold my herd of cattle because I am no longer fast enough to evade a cow protecting her newborn calf. And I still farm a few acres on the side. And I spend a lot of time on the shop floor of my business. But this must all be a lie because the expert in critical thinking checked his meager inventory of mental concepts and couldn't find that such a creature could exist.
You can be critical of Trump and still have valid and important opinions. As long as your hate of Trump does not dominate and corrupt your thinking apparatus, you can add value to the conversation.
I was never a Trump fan in the primaries, and I cringe when I hear his speaking style. But to denigrate him as a liar and narcissist is hilarious given:
1. All establishment politicians are narcissists, and most are fundamentally dishonest in serving their own wants.
2. Trump was the most transparent and open POTUS since Teddy Roosevelt. He just said what was on his mind. And we had decades of exposure to him prior to his entry into politics. It was never a surprise for who he was... so why then do you and others pretend it is a surprise?
3. It was the agenda behind Trump that I supported and still support. I can tolerate a bad personality getting it done... especially given the need today.
Still waiting on those tax returns from the most transparent and open POTUS since TR. And the White House visitor logs. And it's funny how the most transparent president since TR never would allow anyone but a translator sworn to silence into his meetings with Putin, while Putin would roll into those meetings deep. Oh then there was the thing about payments to the porn star and Playboy model he made during his campaign that he was totally upfront about, and which put his fall guy into prison for 3 years. Then there was the part where he was totally upfront in concocting a tale about adoptions as the purpose of a meeting between his son, son in law, and campaign manager and Russian agents in which they were actually there to receive dirt on Hillary Clinton. And on and on and on.
And I'm not sure why you think any of us Never Trumpers are surprised by who he was and is.
This is why you are an object of wonder. You say things like Trump is very transparent and open.
I don't think the cult of anti-Trump has the brainpower to note that their continued crusade against him with breathtaking abuses of power are sending more voters to his corner.
Ah, the troll returns. Don't feed the troll, folks.
Which is why he got throttled and lost states no Republican has lost in generations
"Throttled"? Hyperbole does not communicate credibility.
He lost by ballot harvesting. That won't happen again.
So, the Dems harvested ballots to beat Trump, but not to win more House seats and state leg seats? That certainly is a take
They focused on the swing states. And they harvested ballots to win as much as they could. And in the end, even with DJT derangement syndrome fed to the public for four years prior, the Democrats could barely muster most slim majority ever in the history of our Great Experiment.
The good news it is only 2 years of hell. 2022 will start the Great Repair.
Define ballot harvesting
To increase voter participation, various organizations in multiple states have made active and coordinated efforts to collect absentee voters' ballots during elections. Then they drop them off at polling places or election offices.
This practice, known as ballot harvesting, has been effective and, unsurprisingly, has generated controversy.
Some see the practice of ballot harvesting as a voter service that has long-assisted elderly voters and Native American voters living on remote reservations. Others see it is a political tool that can easily lend itself to fraud.
Generated controversy? Way to hide the subject of that statement
You guys are deranged in regard to Trump. That's the one true thing you wrote
Sure. I have a relative who has severe mental health issues and he thinks the other people are crazy.
Sure, Jan
We all missed you.
The quality of your thought are matched only by the quality of your grammar.
The cult of anti-Trump always go personal first as they have nothing else.
So Trump's own Attorney General testifies to Trump's claims of voter fraud being "all bullshit." I could refer you to a library shelf of books of other things Never-Trumpers "have." But we all know nothing will penetrate.
I am going to guess that you have read none of these books that are my most recent on my Kindle...
Woke Racism тАУ John McWhorter
Hate Inc. тАУ Matt Taibbi
Merchants of Doubt тАУ Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway
The Big Picture тАУ Sean Carroll
Lying тАУ Sam Harris
Clock Work тАУ Mike Michalowisz
The Four Agreements тАУ Don Miguel Ruiz
San Fran-sicko тАУ Michael Shellenberger
The Real Antony Fauci тАУ Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Leading with Gratitude тАУ Adrian Gostick & Chester Alton
The Alchemist тАУ Paulo Coelho
Pandemia тАУ Alex Berenson
Cynical Theories тАУ Helen Pluckrose & James Lindsay
Liberalism in Dark Times тАУ Joshua L. Cherniss
The Righteous Mind тАУ Jonathan Haidt
The Roots of American Order тАУ Russell Kirk
The Parasitic Mind тАУ Gad Saad
Nudge тАУ Richard H. Thaler & Cass R. Sunstein
And I have an Ivy League PhD. So what? I've seen enough of your comments to understand that you have no interest in good faith discussion. You let on how well read you are. But all we get from you are hackneyed concepts like Trump Derangement Syndrome.
That explains quite a bit. I know many, many people with prestigious academic awards, and very few of them do I consider strong critical thinkers. Most of them are myopic in their thought patterns and miss the big picture. That makes sense since they had delayed their launch into the real world to focus on generally one academic discipline. They end up working for me. I hire and fire PhDs from Ivy League schools more often than you probably do any work with your hands.
So I just sold my herd of cattle because I am no longer fast enough to evade a cow protecting her newborn calf. And I still farm a few acres on the side. And I spend a lot of time on the shop floor of my business. But this must all be a lie because the expert in critical thinking checked his meager inventory of mental concepts and couldn't find that such a creature could exist.
An Ivy League phd and a rancher? Well that is sure common.
IтАЩve read or listened to about half of those. You actually read Lying by Harris?
Not yet. Just downloaded a few days ago.
Also forgot to include Coming Apart - Charles Murray
You're aware Harris thinks Trump is trash, and a large part of that is due to his prolific lying?
You can be critical of Trump and still have valid and important opinions. As long as your hate of Trump does not dominate and corrupt your thinking apparatus, you can add value to the conversation.
I was never a Trump fan in the primaries, and I cringe when I hear his speaking style. But to denigrate him as a liar and narcissist is hilarious given:
1. All establishment politicians are narcissists, and most are fundamentally dishonest in serving their own wants.
2. Trump was the most transparent and open POTUS since Teddy Roosevelt. He just said what was on his mind. And we had decades of exposure to him prior to his entry into politics. It was never a surprise for who he was... so why then do you and others pretend it is a surprise?
3. It was the agenda behind Trump that I supported and still support. I can tolerate a bad personality getting it done... especially given the need today.
Still waiting on those tax returns from the most transparent and open POTUS since TR. And the White House visitor logs. And it's funny how the most transparent president since TR never would allow anyone but a translator sworn to silence into his meetings with Putin, while Putin would roll into those meetings deep. Oh then there was the thing about payments to the porn star and Playboy model he made during his campaign that he was totally upfront about, and which put his fall guy into prison for 3 years. Then there was the part where he was totally upfront in concocting a tale about adoptions as the purpose of a meeting between his son, son in law, and campaign manager and Russian agents in which they were actually there to receive dirt on Hillary Clinton. And on and on and on.
And I'm not sure why you think any of us Never Trumpers are surprised by who he was and is.
This is why you are an object of wonder. You say things like Trump is very transparent and open.
That's because he believes whatever Trump and his surrogates tell him because (wait for it)... it is the narrative he WANTS.
Wow, a Trumper talking about a lack of brain power. The irony.
We know reason will not work with this guy. Good luck with being an irritant.
Once again... nothing intelligent nor interesting posted. At least you are consistent.