Although I'm tired of the "Biden is old" schtick (I'd rather everyone talk about Project 2025) at least Democrats can openly discuss and disagree on issues. Biden doesn't threaten to primary them. Unlike the Borg, which can only be assimilated.
Although I'm tired of the "Biden is old" schtick (I'd rather everyone talk about Project 2025) at least Democrats can openly discuss and disagree on issues. Biden doesn't threaten to primary them. Unlike the Borg, which can only be assimilated.
I see that reporting on Project 2025 is starting to happen. I look forward to a full court press with Trump and the GOP on this. Maybe we can start to get the GOP to scurry.
I know. Biden has an ad about Trump and Project 2025, that there are 16 ex-Trump admin people in charge of this. He is fully on board with this. Make him own it.
I want someone to start asking them about the practical stuff and not let them get away with generalities. тАЬHow are you going to pay for those camps? Who is going to pay for them? We know it wonтАЩt be Mexico.тАЭ
It seems that Project 2025 will be targeting many agencies. If we lose or decrease funding for meat plant inspectors, NOAA, etc., who will be the losers? If Project 2025 is looking to put in political appointees at lower levels, or decrease the administrative state, how will be people be affected? What services are they relying on that will either disappear or that they will need to start paying "user fees"?
I also want someone to do the math on the tariffs, especially if he would replace the income tax with them. He needs to be held accountable for all the wishful thinking.
Watch Nicole Wallace on MSNBC. All she talks about is Project 2025. She was the most horrified after the debate. Now it's as if it never happened. Dems are trying to push this issue aside. They won't be able to.
Because she knows any Trump presidency is going to be way worse than a Biden presidency. Biden will surround himself, as he's already done this term, with good, capable, knowledgeable people. Trump will surround himself with scoundrels like himself who just want to make the federal government impotent and the SCOTUS a laughing stock.
2. To the extent that they have any meaning without nominees, the polls have not changed since the debate. Per the 538 aggregation they are less than a point apart in WI and MI. There is work to do in PA where there is a four or five point differential.
AZ and NV are going to be tougher but if he gets the Blue Wall heтАЩs covered.
The Dump Biden folks (you sound as though you may be one) still think thereтАЩs a decision to be made. Biden is the candidate and will soon be the nominee. ItтАЩs imperative to throw all energy behind him.
Project 2025 and SCOTUS and Dobbs will be what overcome Trump. That means they need to be talked about, constantly, and explained.
Agreed. That "debate" made the election almost un-winnable for Biden. Plenty of independent voters are either going to stay home or vote 3rd party after that disaster. Biden's obstinacy is going to cost the senate and the house as well. Nice work Joe.
It should be pushed aside. It is a distraction. Biden was not any different before the debate. Tim Miller counted only 20 bad days in the last 3.5 years before the debate. The debate makes 21. Pfft.
People are coalescing around Harris to replace Biden. That's amounts to the same thing as leaving Biden at the top. If he should be unable to complete his second term, Harris will step in anyway. Preemptively replacing Biden is a bad look, and there are plenty of good reasons to conclude that even if Biden's chances are diminished, his odds are still better than anyone else's.
Riddle me this: Why did Biden give up three minutes of Super Bowl time for an unscripted interview? The inner circle at the White House has known about Biden's infirmaries for a long time. It is shameful that they allowed him to run again in his condition. You talk about a bad look, watch the debate again if you have the stomach for it.
One event does not a conclusion make. You have committed the fallacy of omitting the denominator, in this case of all the other unscripted events he has participated in. Just post debate he participated in around fifteen events, most unscripted, and the press mentioned only two of the events: The NC rally and the ABC interview (Make that three. I saw some coverage of his on-air call to Morning Joe). Notably missing is his appearance at Waffle HOuse the same night as the debate where he was just fine, almost as if the cold medicine had worn off.
The main point is preemptively replacing Biden with Harris is functionally the same as avoiding all this emotional overreaction, and if it should turn out that Biden is unable to complete his second term, then you get Harris anyway.
Although I'm tired of the "Biden is old" schtick (I'd rather everyone talk about Project 2025) at least Democrats can openly discuss and disagree on issues. Biden doesn't threaten to primary them. Unlike the Borg, which can only be assimilated.
I see that reporting on Project 2025 is starting to happen. I look forward to a full court press with Trump and the GOP on this. Maybe we can start to get the GOP to scurry.
Want them to scurry? I'm hard pressed not to say Just turn on the lights....
I can't wait for the new Lincoln project ad to hit the airwaves. Already Trumpster and Steven Miller are saying; Who me? (regarding project 25)
I know. Biden has an ad about Trump and Project 2025, that there are 16 ex-Trump admin people in charge of this. He is fully on board with this. Make him own it.
That Rick Wilson ad is devastating. Too bad the Biden campaign didn't hire him. (my fantasy politics)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60Hyc3tFk5c "Her Own" from Biden-Harris, just released - part of a $50million ad campaign.
I want someone to start asking them about the practical stuff and not let them get away with generalities. тАЬHow are you going to pay for those camps? Who is going to pay for them? We know it wonтАЩt be Mexico.тАЭ
It seems that Project 2025 will be targeting many agencies. If we lose or decrease funding for meat plant inspectors, NOAA, etc., who will be the losers? If Project 2025 is looking to put in political appointees at lower levels, or decrease the administrative state, how will be people be affected? What services are they relying on that will either disappear or that they will need to start paying "user fees"?
I also want someone to do the math on the tariffs, especially if he would replace the income tax with them. He needs to be held accountable for all the wishful thinking.
He's a lousy businessman. This is just more proof.
Watch Nicole Wallace on MSNBC. All she talks about is Project 2025. She was the most horrified after the debate. Now it's as if it never happened. Dems are trying to push this issue aside. They won't be able to.
Because she knows any Trump presidency is going to be way worse than a Biden presidency. Biden will surround himself, as he's already done this term, with good, capable, knowledgeable people. Trump will surround himself with scoundrels like himself who just want to make the federal government impotent and the SCOTUS a laughing stock.
We will. Most voters will vote for a can of corn before Trump.
Well, there's my lawn sign: a can of corn on top and Harris underneath.
Will they? Are the polls *all* wrong? Is Biden actually ahead in every swing state?
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/12/upshot/biden-polls-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.6k0.CUcg.3-7alQ3iL7Zu&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb
Are you looking for an actual response?
1. Yes they will.
2. To the extent that they have any meaning without nominees, the polls have not changed since the debate. Per the 538 aggregation they are less than a point apart in WI and MI. There is work to do in PA where there is a four or five point differential.
AZ and NV are going to be tougher but if he gets the Blue Wall heтАЩs covered.
The Dump Biden folks (you sound as though you may be one) still think thereтАЩs a decision to be made. Biden is the candidate and will soon be the nominee. ItтАЩs imperative to throw all energy behind him.
Project 2025 and SCOTUS and Dobbs will be what overcome Trump. That means they need to be talked about, constantly, and explained.
Biden really needed the polls to move in his favor after the debate. He only has a few chances at audiences that large.
Agreed. That "debate" made the election almost un-winnable for Biden. Plenty of independent voters are either going to stay home or vote 3rd party after that disaster. Biden's obstinacy is going to cost the senate and the house as well. Nice work Joe.
"It will never stop hunting you" * Aragorn to Frodo in Fellowship of the Ring
Dems are trying to push what issue aside...Project 2025?
No, the debate. (At least on Dateline White House).
It should be pushed aside. It is a distraction. Biden was not any different before the debate. Tim Miller counted only 20 bad days in the last 3.5 years before the debate. The debate makes 21. Pfft.
People are coalescing around Harris to replace Biden. That's amounts to the same thing as leaving Biden at the top. If he should be unable to complete his second term, Harris will step in anyway. Preemptively replacing Biden is a bad look, and there are plenty of good reasons to conclude that even if Biden's chances are diminished, his odds are still better than anyone else's.
Riddle me this: Why did Biden give up three minutes of Super Bowl time for an unscripted interview? The inner circle at the White House has known about Biden's infirmaries for a long time. It is shameful that they allowed him to run again in his condition. You talk about a bad look, watch the debate again if you have the stomach for it.
One event does not a conclusion make. You have committed the fallacy of omitting the denominator, in this case of all the other unscripted events he has participated in. Just post debate he participated in around fifteen events, most unscripted, and the press mentioned only two of the events: The NC rally and the ABC interview (Make that three. I saw some coverage of his on-air call to Morning Joe). Notably missing is his appearance at Waffle HOuse the same night as the debate where he was just fine, almost as if the cold medicine had worn off.
The main point is preemptively replacing Biden with Harris is functionally the same as avoiding all this emotional overreaction, and if it should turn out that Biden is unable to complete his second term, then you get Harris anyway.