6 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Paul K. Ogden's avatar

I'm trying to envision a Nicole Wallace interview being excellent. Meadow is a thoughtful intellectual. Wallace is anything but.

Expand full comment
Hopehappens's avatar

I know that many, many people feel that way about Maddow, and I know she has done some exceptional work with podcasts and books, but I can’t watch her. She prattles on incessantly or reads court documents or newspapers to us. The night Cheney was on, Rachel ran her mouth for 30 minutes straight. With all the commercials in the second half, we got about 15 minutes of Cheney. It reminded me that if she has a guest I would like to hear, I won’t get to really hear them on her show.

Expand full comment
Paul K. Ogden's avatar

I don't like Maddow's liberal politics. But I have enormous respect for the homework she does for each program. Other hosts rely on multiple guests to fill the time. They don't put in the homework

Expand full comment
Colleen Kochivar-Baker's avatar

Nicole's interview was excellent for a number of reasons. Cheney was more comfortable with Wallace and was more open about some things. That let Nicole ask her more pointed questions and get better answers.

Expand full comment
Linda Malboeuf's avatar

Nicolle is excellent

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I like Nicole Wallace. Listen to every podcast.

I like Rachel Maddow too, but often need a break from her affectations in delivery.

Expand full comment
ErrorError