I'm concerned what will happen even if Biden wins. He will not win by a lot of he does, which will open the door to claims of a stolen election once again. This needs to be thought through and preparations for different scenarios put in place since the response may well be much worse than last time.
I'm concerned what will happen even if Biden wins. He will not win by a lot of he does, which will open the door to claims of a stolen election once again. This needs to be thought through and preparations for different scenarios put in place since the response may well be much worse than last time.
What if this summer is scorching everywhere, with risks of crop failures due to drought, and the impacts of climate inaction from 1980 - 2020 really -- and I mean **really** finally turning the focus on the GOP enablers in the US political system? Should this happen, the topic of Dark Money, given us by the Roberts SCOTUS, is going to gain a whole new resonance even for low info voters.
Although it is true that pundits tend to look to markets, Biden is the *only* elected to act significantly on climate change, and he may be the only elected with enough skill to keep pushing for sensible responses to increasing risks. (The GOP thinks in linear terms, but climate is exponential. The GOP is not at all equipped intellectually, financially, socially, or demographically to deal with the interrelated issues of climate, migration, and Dark Money. It's the job of the Dems to help people grasp the interactions.)
I don't disagree with what you say, but I don't think the next summer will be substantially hotter (I subscribe to the frog boiling metaphor) or that Biden will get his due credit (when has he?).
I'm concerned what will happen even if Biden wins. He will not win by a lot of he does, which will open the door to claims of a stolen election once again. This needs to be thought through and preparations for different scenarios put in place since the response may well be much worse than last time.
What if this summer is scorching everywhere, with risks of crop failures due to drought, and the impacts of climate inaction from 1980 - 2020 really -- and I mean **really** finally turning the focus on the GOP enablers in the US political system? Should this happen, the topic of Dark Money, given us by the Roberts SCOTUS, is going to gain a whole new resonance even for low info voters.
Although it is true that pundits tend to look to markets, Biden is the *only* elected to act significantly on climate change, and he may be the only elected with enough skill to keep pushing for sensible responses to increasing risks. (The GOP thinks in linear terms, but climate is exponential. The GOP is not at all equipped intellectually, financially, socially, or demographically to deal with the interrelated issues of climate, migration, and Dark Money. It's the job of the Dems to help people grasp the interactions.)
I don't disagree with what you say, but I don't think the next summer will be substantially hotter (I subscribe to the frog boiling metaphor) or that Biden will get his due credit (when has he?).