I mean, the "oof" factor is really high here when Charlie is arguing that this policy isn't playing well with rank-and-file Dem voters and the first examples he reaches for are McArdle, Kraushaar, and The Dispatch.
I mean, the "oof" factor is really high here when Charlie is arguing that this policy isn't playing well with rank-and-file Dem voters and the first examples he reaches for are McArdle, Kraushaar, and The Dispatch.
I saw some of the usual Savvy Anti-Anti Crew really taking this up to eleven by referring to this as "The Republicans' Roe" which strikes me as an absurd example of motivated reasoning but even if it wasn't....pretty telling that "helping some people being strangled by debt" = "stripping bodily autonomy from half the population"
Confirmation Bias, what is it?
I mean, the "oof" factor is really high here when Charlie is arguing that this policy isn't playing well with rank-and-file Dem voters and the first examples he reaches for are McArdle, Kraushaar, and The Dispatch.
I saw some of the usual Savvy Anti-Anti Crew really taking this up to eleven by referring to this as "The Republicans' Roe" which strikes me as an absurd example of motivated reasoning but even if it wasn't....pretty telling that "helping some people being strangled by debt" = "stripping bodily autonomy from half the population"
I didnтАЩt catch this, but I donтАЩt know whether to laugh or cry in response.