4 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Peter T's avatar

It's not an argument until someone brings Hitler in, right? :-)

Heh, no, the point was where's the tipping point between personal morals and societal utility?

Expand full comment
James Ashley's avatar

I think if there is that sense that Dems have to justify that sense of bad faith they feel deep down in terms of the wickedness of the other guys, then that's too far. I think this is a pretty good compass to go by. But also if the phrase 'two clever by half' is in any way applicable, we have also probably gone too far. Check it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/03/democrats-face-blowback-after-boosting-far-right-michigan-candidate/

Expand full comment
Peter T's avatar

I certainly respect your view. It's also my default starting point for most things.

OTOH, the joke about the driver of the Pinto asserting his right-of-way against the double semi comes to mind. Principles won't do you much good if you're dead.

Expand full comment
James Ashley's avatar

That isn't the situation we're in. That's why you aren't allowed to jump to "what if they were Nazis". They aren't.

Expand full comment