OK, I get your point. So with respect to this librarian selecting or not selecting a book for her collection, what does that mean? She should have books without facts in them that further unfounded conspiracy theories?
As I said, I probably would have included such a book.
This title came to mind: The Elders of Zion. I checked my cit…
OK, I get your point. So with respect to this librarian selecting or not selecting a book for her collection, what does that mean? She should have books without facts in them that further unfounded conspiracy theories?
As I said, I probably would have included such a book.
This title came to mind: The Elders of Zion. I checked my city library (80K residents). Not in the collection. I checked the city of LA library (3.8 million), and they had it.
A small city library can't have every book. The librarian has to choose based on whatever criteria her board has established, which includes what best serves the interests of the people in the community they serve.
OK, I get your point. So with respect to this librarian selecting or not selecting a book for her collection, what does that mean? She should have books without facts in them that further unfounded conspiracy theories?
As I said, I probably would have included such a book.
This title came to mind: The Elders of Zion. I checked my city library (80K residents). Not in the collection. I checked the city of LA library (3.8 million), and they had it.
A small city library can't have every book. The librarian has to choose based on whatever criteria her board has established, which includes what best serves the interests of the people in the community they serve.