More than that, it is proof that Kelly did not belong on the Supreme Court to begin with. It was yet another wrongheaded decision by Scott Walker to put him there previously, by appointment, and twice now Wisconsin voters have proved, in rejecting Kelly as a seriously flawed candidate, that they know better than Walker and those still cl…
More than that, it is proof that Kelly did not belong on the Supreme Court to begin with. It was yet another wrongheaded decision by Scott Walker to put him there previously, by appointment, and twice now Wisconsin voters have proved, in rejecting Kelly as a seriously flawed candidate, that they know better than Walker and those still clinging to Walkerism what is a better pathway for our state. If only enough people had listened in 2010 and not given us this unwanted radical GOP gift that keeps on giving, through extreme gerrymandering, inside the chambers of the House and Senate.
More than that, it is proof that Kelly did not belong on the Supreme Court to begin with. It was yet another wrongheaded decision by Scott Walker to put him there previously, by appointment, and twice now Wisconsin voters have proved, in rejecting Kelly as a seriously flawed candidate, that they know better than Walker and those still clinging to Walkerism what is a better pathway for our state. If only enough people had listened in 2010 and not given us this unwanted radical GOP gift that keeps on giving, through extreme gerrymandering, inside the chambers of the House and Senate.
Sure seems like he'd have had a major chip on his shoulder as a judge, with just a hint of peevishness and vindictiveness.
I don't know if I had ever spent more time and care in filling in a ballot oval than I did in voting against that imbecile. Felt good!
YAY RAY!