Aside: I'm not sure how other Bulwark members feel, but I would really appreciate if theBulwark made distinctions between the nominees. That is, take the time to distinguish between really bad nominees from those that are undesirable, but largely competent, or even those who would be good. etc. For me, the publication would seem more rea…
Aside: I'm not sure how other Bulwark members feel, but I would really appreciate if theBulwark made distinctions between the nominees. That is, take the time to distinguish between really bad nominees from those that are undesirable, but largely competent, or even those who would be good. etc. For me, the publication would seem more reasonable and measured--which would strengthen my trust (read: would keep me reading and subscribing).
Aside: I'm not sure how other Bulwark members feel, but I would really appreciate if theBulwark made distinctions between the nominees. That is, take the time to distinguish between really bad nominees from those that are undesirable, but largely competent, or even those who would be good. etc. For me, the publication would seem more reasonable and measured--which would strengthen my trust (read: would keep me reading and subscribing).