This is what is really at stake. The pro-life/pro-choice wording obscures the reality of the debate. It's not about fetal life vs bodily autonomy at this point.
It's about a women's right to become pregnant and have the right to a 21st century standard of care for the duration of that pregnancy, without anyone involved in her care needing to consult a lawyer at any point.
This is what is really at stake. The pro-life/pro-choice wording obscures the reality of the debate. It's not about fetal life vs bodily autonomy at this point.
It's about a women's right to become pregnant and have the right to a 21st century standard of care for the duration of that pregnancy, without anyone involved in her care needing to consult a lawyer at any point.
This is doubly true in TX, which is why TX is leading the nation in pregnancy horror stories. Tort law heavily favors doctors over patients in the state, and now any doctor who deemed complicit in an abortion can be the target of a civil suit. Recipe for utter disaster.
Seconded.
This is what is really at stake. The pro-life/pro-choice wording obscures the reality of the debate. It's not about fetal life vs bodily autonomy at this point.
It's about a women's right to become pregnant and have the right to a 21st century standard of care for the duration of that pregnancy, without anyone involved in her care needing to consult a lawyer at any point.
This is doubly true in TX, which is why TX is leading the nation in pregnancy horror stories. Tort law heavily favors doctors over patients in the state, and now any doctor who deemed complicit in an abortion can be the target of a civil suit. Recipe for utter disaster.