Their take was basically that total destruction of Iran's nuclear program would be the best outcome, given that's the end of the conflict for the moment (a gap longer than months). But you should listen to the episode if you want the full, more detailed answer to your question.
Well, if you listened, why are you asking me? Why not explain it yourself and why you find it a more interesting aspect? Are you quizzing me? Are you trolling? Whenever I see your comments around here, you seem really like you are trying to pick fights, so I'm not going to reply to you anymore.
The Shield of the Republic fellows said this (only partially destroying Iran's nuclear program vs completely) would be a pretty unwanted outcome.
A better question is what the Shield of the Republic fellows think is wanted outcome.
Their take was basically that total destruction of Iran's nuclear program would be the best outcome, given that's the end of the conflict for the moment (a gap longer than months). But you should listen to the episode if you want the full, more detailed answer to your question.
Me?
DonтАЩt worry, I listened VERY carefully.
I listened for a few particular words.
Well, if you listened, why are you asking me? Why not explain it yourself and why you find it a more interesting aspect? Are you quizzing me? Are you trolling? Whenever I see your comments around here, you seem really like you are trying to pick fights, so I'm not going to reply to you anymore.
Do you want to talk about the podcast, or do you want to just yell at me?
Is it?
Not the lying by the state? Not the military action without congressional approval?
ItтАЩs all my fault?
Sorry about that.
Tell me David, which profile picture should I have to reduce тАЬour domestic problemтАЭ?