i think unfortunately with a little poking around one can find pretty good non-biased reporting on iran's skirting of the treaty and so on ... is it a slam dunk, do we have iranian top officials on record in the public on that? no. it's not that solid, but pretty good, enough to think that the treaty alone would not have been enough to p…
i think unfortunately with a little poking around one can find pretty good non-biased reporting on iran's skirting of the treaty and so on ... is it a slam dunk, do we have iranian top officials on record in the public on that? no. it's not that solid, but pretty good, enough to think that the treaty alone would not have been enough to prevent them from eventually having a weapon. once again or maybe i should be more clear -- i'm not really defending the specifics of this strike, but just pt out that the long standing policy of a non-nuke-weapon iran has been this nations (also our allies i believe) goal thru several presidencies now. and we aren't there yet.
i think unfortunately with a little poking around one can find pretty good non-biased reporting on iran's skirting of the treaty and so on ... is it a slam dunk, do we have iranian top officials on record in the public on that? no. it's not that solid, but pretty good, enough to think that the treaty alone would not have been enough to prevent them from eventually having a weapon. once again or maybe i should be more clear -- i'm not really defending the specifics of this strike, but just pt out that the long standing policy of a non-nuke-weapon iran has been this nations (also our allies i believe) goal thru several presidencies now. and we aren't there yet.