5 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Sean's avatar

Sarah - I don’t think they meant to lie about WMD. They had bad intelligence.

OR - Did Cheney and Rumsfeld cherry pick certain bits of info to convince a president who already wanted to attack Iraq?? That’s what I think happened. This is where Sarah’s naivety about republicans is a weakness. You still hold conservative values, fine, nothing wrong with that. But if you truly believed that the Bush II White House was duped into attacking Iraq then you need to check all the facts. Not swallow the neo-con fantasy.

Expand full comment
Shana's avatar

That one stopped me in my tracks, too. Been a long time since somebody was like "yeah, Cheney and Rove were good dudes." :) You can take the girl out of the GOP, but....

Expand full comment
Elliott Rosengarten's avatar

Follow the money. Cheney. Halliburton.

Expand full comment
Bruce Lawrence's avatar

At the time, everyone believed Saddam had chemical weapons. He had actually used chemical weapons against the Kurds and Iran. There was no reason at the time to believe he had unilaterally disarmed himself of those chemical weapons, even though that now appears to have been the case. And he did his best to make his neighbors think he still had those chemical weapons, for obvious reasons.

WMDs might have been a stupid pretext for invasion, but the pretext itself was not a lie, and it took no convincing since everyone already believed it.

Expand full comment
Pete Mcaveney's avatar

Not everyone. I knew.

Expand full comment
ErrorError