All for a big tax cut that no one needs. Poor people can’t make do with a lot less and rich people can’t get a lot more. It has become the story of America
Sickening. I was a social worker and Head Start filled in so many gaps for single moms struggling with childcare, preschool and child development education.
As a Head Start program director I can assure you we are making plans to respond to pauses in payments. Most don't understand that when our grant is approved we don't actually get the grant amount up front. We have to draw down money right before we make payments. They don't want us to hold money we drawn down more than 3 days. So if we go to draw down money and have issues, checks are already being processed. So the uncertainty and lack of a regional specialist point of contact is quite precarious.
When we get to thinking about how to distribute wealth and resources in ways that can benefit the greatest number of people, fairly and equitably, we also come up against things like the campaign in Trump 2.0 to eradicate "DEI" wherever it persists. IMO, these initials could also stand for Donald Jr, Eric and Ivanka. By all means, let's have our careful discussion on who we need to help. But keeping in mind who always helps themselves first.
Trump is right on this one. Why did all of those children (and their parents) choose to live in poverty? Why didn't they pick to be born into rich families where their fathers could give them millions to lose in unsuccessful businesses? And since Trump wants to do away with all safety net programs, we no longer need to think about the fact that early childhood education programs increase the odds that poor children will grow up to complete more schooling and be more gainfully employed and uninvolved with the criminal justice system than those who don't participate. Moreover, how can Jonathan Cohn recommend that the Trump administration should do research about the most effective ways of providing high quality programs yielding very positive outcomes for children and society in stead of just cutting the programs? Cohn knows that Trump has not appointed anyone with educational expertise to relevant departments. Nor does he and his inner cabal care about facts the future as long as Trump can make as much money as possible and preserve big tax cuts for the already rich. As the head of World Wrestling Entertainment, Linda McMahon has the skills to bring MAGA - Make America GROAN Again - to the nation's classrooms.
As I read about all of the cuts at HHS - child poverty programs, STI/HIV programs, vaccine programs, etc. etc., one theme emerges for me - the Darwinian notion of survival of the fittest. Secretary Kennedy and Presidents Trump and Musk flirt around the edges of eugenics. Not healthy enough to survive the measles, too weak to overcome a sexually transmitted infection, too poor to pull yourself up by the bootstraps - then it’s just fine to consign you to an early death. Only the fittest deserve to live in their minds. We are in a dark moment in our history.
A Darwinian dystopia. It seems that to them, it actually strengthens society to winnow out the weak, old, vulnerable. Because that pruning will improve the stock. Those individuals that withstood the thinning out, will be the more gifted and resilient. More equipped to contribute more to society, increasing prosperity and living standards for us all. But as for those born into rough, non-privileged circumstances, only a very few will possess the inborn ability to rise out of their legacy of poverty. The great majority will be more or less lifelong burdens on society. So probably much better to do things that thin their childhood ranks, as preemptive remedy. Retire programs such as anti childhood poverty, universal pre-K, tax credits for families with kids, cut SNAP, WIC programs, defund public education to the bone. The list is very long.
I think they are connoisseurs of the Darwinian flavor to all of this. But more to the point, what they appreciate most is less of their money being taxed away for the purpose of helping other people.
Child care is so important, and has been mostly ignored as an issue for the U.S. This extra blow will have a big impact - all negative - on millions of lives. Thank you for writing about this aspect of the MAGA nightmare.
Somehow the countries with less poverty have a better standard of living for most of their citizens. The US has wealth but never makes it into the top 10 for happiness, or most livable. That the wealth just is wealth but not really quality of life.
I got that you were being sarcastic, but had something other to say than just a laugh. There is an irony that the US is so wealthy but that does not make it a happy country because the wealth is so unequally distributed.
And to think that "they" want to move special education into HHS. Let's just guess what is going to happen.
All for a big tax cut that no one needs. Poor people can’t make do with a lot less and rich people can’t get a lot more. It has become the story of America
Sickening. I was a social worker and Head Start filled in so many gaps for single moms struggling with childcare, preschool and child development education.
When the heck did The Bulwark get Jonanthan Cohn! That's a get!
Hope people can protest these changes to the school education system.
As a Head Start program director I can assure you we are making plans to respond to pauses in payments. Most don't understand that when our grant is approved we don't actually get the grant amount up front. We have to draw down money right before we make payments. They don't want us to hold money we drawn down more than 3 days. So if we go to draw down money and have issues, checks are already being processed. So the uncertainty and lack of a regional specialist point of contact is quite precarious.
Man’s inhumanity to man.
When we get to thinking about how to distribute wealth and resources in ways that can benefit the greatest number of people, fairly and equitably, we also come up against things like the campaign in Trump 2.0 to eradicate "DEI" wherever it persists. IMO, these initials could also stand for Donald Jr, Eric and Ivanka. By all means, let's have our careful discussion on who we need to help. But keeping in mind who always helps themselves first.
Heartbreaking. Maddening. Shameful betrayal of our values as a country.
Trump is right on this one. Why did all of those children (and their parents) choose to live in poverty? Why didn't they pick to be born into rich families where their fathers could give them millions to lose in unsuccessful businesses? And since Trump wants to do away with all safety net programs, we no longer need to think about the fact that early childhood education programs increase the odds that poor children will grow up to complete more schooling and be more gainfully employed and uninvolved with the criminal justice system than those who don't participate. Moreover, how can Jonathan Cohn recommend that the Trump administration should do research about the most effective ways of providing high quality programs yielding very positive outcomes for children and society in stead of just cutting the programs? Cohn knows that Trump has not appointed anyone with educational expertise to relevant departments. Nor does he and his inner cabal care about facts the future as long as Trump can make as much money as possible and preserve big tax cuts for the already rich. As the head of World Wrestling Entertainment, Linda McMahon has the skills to bring MAGA - Make America GROAN Again - to the nation's classrooms.
Trump has never seen a poverty-stricken child so they don't exist.
Thank you, Mr. Cohn, for this great explanation of what’s involved in all the cuts. It’s unspeakably cold.
As I read about all of the cuts at HHS - child poverty programs, STI/HIV programs, vaccine programs, etc. etc., one theme emerges for me - the Darwinian notion of survival of the fittest. Secretary Kennedy and Presidents Trump and Musk flirt around the edges of eugenics. Not healthy enough to survive the measles, too weak to overcome a sexually transmitted infection, too poor to pull yourself up by the bootstraps - then it’s just fine to consign you to an early death. Only the fittest deserve to live in their minds. We are in a dark moment in our history.
A Darwinian dystopia. It seems that to them, it actually strengthens society to winnow out the weak, old, vulnerable. Because that pruning will improve the stock. Those individuals that withstood the thinning out, will be the more gifted and resilient. More equipped to contribute more to society, increasing prosperity and living standards for us all. But as for those born into rough, non-privileged circumstances, only a very few will possess the inborn ability to rise out of their legacy of poverty. The great majority will be more or less lifelong burdens on society. So probably much better to do things that thin their childhood ranks, as preemptive remedy. Retire programs such as anti childhood poverty, universal pre-K, tax credits for families with kids, cut SNAP, WIC programs, defund public education to the bone. The list is very long.
I think they are connoisseurs of the Darwinian flavor to all of this. But more to the point, what they appreciate most is less of their money being taxed away for the purpose of helping other people.
Child care is so important, and has been mostly ignored as an issue for the U.S. This extra blow will have a big impact - all negative - on millions of lives. Thank you for writing about this aspect of the MAGA nightmare.
Is there an organization I could donate to that would help mitigate the funding shortfall?
'Everyone knows' the poor should remain poor, else what's the use of being born rich?
Somehow the countries with less poverty have a better standard of living for most of their citizens. The US has wealth but never makes it into the top 10 for happiness, or most livable. That the wealth just is wealth but not really quality of life.
Thanks, but a shame you're sarcasm resistant/irony deprived.
I got that you were being sarcastic, but had something other to say than just a laugh. There is an irony that the US is so wealthy but that does not make it a happy country because the wealth is so unequally distributed.
OK, seriously, whose ancestors came to the US because they were HAPPY to do so?
My point: we many be genetically and environmentally driven to be unhappy.
Denmark and Sweden are in the top 5 for happiness. Are you willing to bet that also reflects their recent immigrants?