Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sherry Murray's avatar

I think your comments re the decisions of the Court are kinda naive. Their decision in Moore v Harper should’ve been a slam dunk in the most uncertain terms inasmuch as what the state was proposing was antithetical to democracy. I have mixed feelings about their decision on affirmative action since I think that colleges should be considering socio-economic factors as least as much as race, but the undeniably racist overtones of some of the opinions is undeniable and at odds with reality. But the case that concerns me the most-and places this court in the firmly-beyond-radical-to-the-right of a banana republic is the one involving the Colorado web designer. She had NO standing- one whatsoever. They drum standing into you in law school and here it was TOTALLY lacking. She hadn’t been harmed- it was pure hypothetical. Then it turns out that the person they alleged who was thinking about using her services was totally fabricated and that they used the name of a straight person who does his own designs. How didn’t that come out in the lower court decisions. I’m sorry and am not being snarky, but your saying that the decisions this term aren’t radical is like being grateful that the souse who just beat the shit out you didn’t kill you.

Expand full comment
Kevin Robbins's avatar

When Tim Scott and other Republicans aren’t lying about immigrants bringing in fentanyl, do they spend any time thinking about ways to stop the flow of guns into Mexico?

Expand full comment
412 more comments...