Nailed it. It's a corporate ethos, where people are (temporarily) rewarded for the creating the appearance of change ("Things are happening!"), not on the impact of change ("Over promise, under deliver."). If it doesn't work out, they are canned, receive a healthy severance package, and are working and doing the same thing 90 days later. Rinse. Repeat.
Nailed it. It's a corporate ethos, where people are (temporarily) rewarded for the creating the appearance of change ("Things are happening!"), not on the impact of change ("Over promise, under deliver."). If it doesn't work out, they are canned, receive a healthy severance package, and are working and doing the same thing 90 days later. Rinse. Repeat.
Well said—it’s a cycle we see play out again and again, where the illusion of progress is rewarded more than actual results. And when the fallout comes, the ones responsible just move on, leaving others to deal with the wreckage. I really appreciate you taking the time to read and share your thoughts; in an algorithm-driven world, the effort it takes to comment is an often underappreciated force in amplifying the best ideas.
Nailed it. It's a corporate ethos, where people are (temporarily) rewarded for the creating the appearance of change ("Things are happening!"), not on the impact of change ("Over promise, under deliver."). If it doesn't work out, they are canned, receive a healthy severance package, and are working and doing the same thing 90 days later. Rinse. Repeat.
Well said—it’s a cycle we see play out again and again, where the illusion of progress is rewarded more than actual results. And when the fallout comes, the ones responsible just move on, leaving others to deal with the wreckage. I really appreciate you taking the time to read and share your thoughts; in an algorithm-driven world, the effort it takes to comment is an often underappreciated force in amplifying the best ideas.