Although not on point for Maniacal Matt, we need to keep this in mind when talking about the efforts being made to "normalize" Hypocritical Hegseth's Monterey incident, which came from a different string elsewhere in the Bulwark:
"There are so many comments here that excuse this behavior due to alcohol consumption. No one seems to recall …
Although not on point for Maniacal Matt, we need to keep this in mind when talking about the efforts being made to "normalize" Hypocritical Hegseth's Monterey incident, which came from a different string elsewhere in the Bulwark:
"There are so many comments here that excuse this behavior due to alcohol consumption. No one seems to recall that when this took place, Hegseth was married to his second wife, involved in an affair with a subordinate who had given birth into his child just two months earlier. What matters is the character of a man who could become the leader of the most powerful military on the planet. Is his behavior in any way exemplary and inspirational to our men and women in uniform?"
Yep, birds of a feather f(l)uck together, or do I have a typo in there?
Although not on point for Maniacal Matt, we need to keep this in mind when talking about the efforts being made to "normalize" Hypocritical Hegseth's Monterey incident, which came from a different string elsewhere in the Bulwark:
"There are so many comments here that excuse this behavior due to alcohol consumption. No one seems to recall that when this took place, Hegseth was married to his second wife, involved in an affair with a subordinate who had given birth into his child just two months earlier. What matters is the character of a man who could become the leader of the most powerful military on the planet. Is his behavior in any way exemplary and inspirational to our men and women in uniform?"
Yep, birds of a feather f(l)uck together, or do I have a typo in there?