The Bulwark

The Bulwark

Home
Watch
Shows
Newsletters
Chat
Special Projects
Events
Founders
Store
Archive
About
The Triad

Give Chuck a Break. It Could Have Been Worse.

Even though Democrats didn’t get the biggest possible win, they still won the shutdown.

Jonathan V. Last's avatar
Jonathan V. Last
Nov 10, 2025
∙ Paid

Sorry for no Triad on Friday. There’s a longer explanation down in #3.


Senate Master of Strategery Chuck Schumer. (Jabin Botsford/Washington Post via Getty Images)

1. Outcomes

On Friday, Tim argued that the Democrats could declare victory in the shutdown, vote for cloture, and move on to the next battle. This morning Andrew wrote that Democrats had rewarded a hostage-taker.

They’re both right.

Like Dr. Strange, I have seen all six possible endgames from the shutdown fight and I’m here to tell you that yes, Democrats could have done better. They probably should have done better. But they exit this event in a stronger position than they entered. And also: They could have done much worse.

We’re going to rank the shutdown endgames from best to worst and then I’m going to make the case simultaneously that (a) Democrats played their hand poorly from the start, but that (b) they were ultimately bailed out by Trump’s obsession with dominance, and (c) we ought to appreciate the bad stuff that didn’t happen here.

Boy, howdy, are you not going to like this. Not. One. Bit.

So let’s start with the best-case scenario for how the shutdown could have ended:

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Bulwark Media · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture