Hard disagree. Perot might have made it where Clinton won on plurality rather than majority, but because of the economy that year Bush 1 was always going to lose and the taxes he raised guaranteed it
Hard disagree. Perot might have made it where Clinton won on plurality rather than majority, but because of the economy that year Bush 1 was always going to lose and the taxes he raised guaranteed it
Hard disagree. Perot might have made it where Clinton won on plurality rather than majority, but because of the economy that year Bush 1 was always going to lose and the taxes he raised guaranteed it
ok maybe a bit of both
I don't have actual numbers of votes
which should tell the tale
(back then they were all counted)